At this year's two sessions, the policy-related orientation is very obvious.
In addition to "implementing policies in the city and meeting reasonable housing needs", "canceling the pre-sale system of commercial housing" and "canceling the public pool" have also become hot topics.
In particular, "cancel the public pool" once rushed to the first place in the hot search list.
390 million reads and 37,000 discussions.
This shows the high degree of attention.
So, should the pool area be cancelled in the end?
To answer this question, we must first understand, why do people hate the public pool so much?
It can be summarized in two simple points:
1) The area is "shrunk", spending a lot of money to live in the cottage.
We buy a house based on the construction area as a unit, such as a 100 square meter house, may only have more than 70 square meters.
The more than 20 square meters that are "hidden" are actually public pools.
Pool area = floor area - area within the suite
For example, elevator shafts, pipe wells, stairwells, equipment rooms, substation rooms, aisles, public entrance halls, etc., all belong to the category of public pooling.
To put it bluntly, it is to spread the public area evenly over the heads of each household.
But you can't tell what you're sharing equally and what's your money.
This creates a "gray space".
Some unscrupulous developers have included some that should not be part of the public pool, and seek private interests by making the public pool bigger.
This in turn leads to a "low" occupancy rate of the house.
Normally, the high-rise out rate is generally 72-75%, the small high is 75-80%, and the bungalow is 80-83%.
But some houses are as low as more than 40 percent.
Gaomi, Shandong, Qingdao, Nanjing... There have been such extreme cases.
Bought an 85-square-meter house and it was less than 50 square meters.
Therefore, it has attracted the voice of the people.
2) Repeated charges, but can not benefit.
Along with the pool area, there are also a series of derivative charges, which also feel unreasonable.
For example, for houses delivered in hardcover, the hardcover cost is also calculated according to the building area * hardcover standard.
That is to say, the pool also paid for hardcover money.
You say injustice?
The same goes for the property fee.
Some are also confused and have been charged repeatedly.
For example, civil air defense parking spaces, which should not have been counted in the pool, but some developers not only counted, but also took out the parking spaces to sell, and buyers had to pay management fees after purchasing.
The same parking space, how many times has this been collected?
There are also those who use public pooling for profit, but the owners do not make a profit.
The most common is the residential elevator advertisement. The elevator in the residential area belongs to the pool area and is shared by the owners.
In line with the principle of "who pays the money and who benefits", the income generated by the advertising space should be distributed to everyone.
In fact, no owner has ever received it.
In short, there is too much catnip in it.
So, is it really good to cancel the pool?
Inevitably, house prices will rise.
Do you think that by canceling the pool and only calculating the area in the suite, the cost of buying a house will come down?
Too young too simple！
It's like a shelled durian, and how can it be the same price as the peeled durian meat.
The wool comes from the sheep, and the developer will convert the original part of the money into the house price in the suite.
Chongqing has given the verification.
Although the sales office will publicize the area and floor area of the suite, in fact, the two are only different unit prices, but the total price has not changed.
Another point is that the quality of living will definitely decline.
Since the profit is the area in the suite, the developer will try his best to compress the pool and make the set larger.
What homecoming lobby, entrance lobby, what garden landscape, what owners clubhouse...
Ban them all!
It even compresses the area of public areas such as aisles and elevators.
2 ladders 2 households into 2 ladders more than 10 households, the elevator can not put into the furniture, the corridor is narrow enough to turn sideways, and the building also has to bow its head...
It's not a joke, it's entirely possible.
Not to mention, developers are now racking their brains to "donate area" in order to enhance competitiveness.
Will all disappear.
If the property fee is also charged according to the set, it is actually the same as the house price.
You get what you pay for, the property fee is low, and the service will be low.
And nearly 80% of the property fee is a labor cost.
For example, the cheap property is the uncle's doorkeeper, and the better property is the boy.
Therefore, as a buyer in the new era, you must be calm.
The area of the pool is not the original sin, whether it is collected according to the building surface or the collection in the set, but the calculation method is different.
In fact, "change the soup without changing the medicine".
Perhaps instead, it will create more wool opportunities for developers.
The real bug is that the pool system is imperfect and opaque.
Even if the developer steals the area, you can't measure it.
Figure this out and decide whether to support it or not.