laitimes

The unarmed disabled man was denied permission to cross the unobstructed passage on the grounds that he could not prove it without documents.

author:Kung Fu Middle Dao Gate

In the past two days, there have been frequent hot news in Wuhan, Hubei, yesterday the filming of the family class was dissatisfied with the residents, and today the video of a man without arms passing through the security check on the light rail has aroused heated discussions among netizens.

Event recap

Recently, a disabled man, Mr. Li, took the light rail home as usual, unlike usual, today forgot to bring the disability certificate, due to the rush hour traffic is not smooth, Mr. Li went home again, so Mr. Li took the initiative to find the security staff, asked if he could give himself a convenience.

Logically speaking, Mr. Li had a visible disability that should be understood and cared for, but the staff carried out the work regulations and strictly enforced them, so Mr. Li's request was not sympathetic and granted.

However, what puzzled Mr. Li, the masses and netizens at that time was that the staff's dogmatic way of working was really speechless.

The staff said that Mr. Li could not produce his documents and could not prove that he was disabled, so he could not pass according to the existing regulations.

The unarmed disabled man was denied permission to cross the unobstructed passage on the grounds that he could not prove it without documents.

Isn't that ridiculous?

Mr. Li was speechless, he didn't have arms that were clearly visible to the naked eye, how could he prove it?

The staff doesn't care about this, only certify the piece.

Mr. Li thinks that if he doesn't have a disability certificate, he is not a disabled person, and even if he does, he can't get it.

The unarmed disabled man was denied permission to cross the unobstructed passage on the grounds that he could not prove it without documents.

At that time, Mr. Li's situation caused the onlookers to be dissatisfied with the staff, thinking that the work was too rigid and impersonal, and Mr. Li should be taken care of.

In the end, Mr. Li reluctantly bought a ticket to enter the station from the ordinary passage, but this scene is really sad to watch. (Below)

The unarmed disabled man was denied permission to cross the unobstructed passage on the grounds that he could not prove it without documents.

The relevant departments gave a timely explanation of the situation

As soon as the video was uploaded to the Internet, it aroused heated discussions among netizens, and was also valued by relevant departments, and the local Disabled Persons' Federation gave an explanation.

The unarmed disabled man was denied permission to cross the unobstructed passage on the grounds that he could not prove it without documents.

The light rail sector also responded. It is stated that the staff did not properly handle the problem on site and failed to properly protect the travel rights and interests of people with disabilities, and the travel service guarantee for special passengers will be optimized in the future.

The unarmed disabled man was denied permission to cross the unobstructed passage on the grounds that he could not prove it without documents.

Several suggestions given by netizens

Netizen A believes that since the big data is so perfect now, all channels and security checkpoints can be used for face authentication, and all the information will appear, which not only saves the workload of the staff, but also saves time and convenience for the masses.

The unarmed disabled man was denied permission to cross the unobstructed passage on the grounds that he could not prove it without documents.

Netizen B believes that the disability certificate can prove that the holder is a disabled person, and the disabled person who does not hold a certificate and is visible to the naked eye should be regarded as holding a certificate, which should be based on the actual situation and cannot be too rigid.

The unarmed disabled man was denied permission to cross the unobstructed passage on the grounds that he could not prove it without documents.

Netizens also turned over old accounts, saying that the Wuhan Metro was dogmatic, and it failed to increase its capacity in freezing and rainy weather, and did not speed up the security check.

The unarmed disabled man was denied permission to cross the unobstructed passage on the grounds that he could not prove it without documents.

Finally, I would like to say

Certificates exist to prove facts, so when the facts are in front of you, are they not more convincing than documents? If a normal person who has a fake disability certificate can pass the certificate, but a real disabled person cannot, then what is the significance of the certificate?

I hope that things like this will not happen again, that those who are physically disabled will not be hurt in their hearts again, but that they should be given warmth and care.

What do you think about this?