Recently, China Telecom's 2024 5G network equipment bid opened, Huawei once again lost China Telecom's important 5G equipment order, on the other hand, competitor Ericsson defeated Huawei to win China Telecom's 5G network equipment large order, whether Huawei suffered "exclusion" and "kickback" in the network There has been widespread controversy!
Industry veterans say that Ericsson can beat Huawei is really deserved, and there is no problem of "xenophobia" and "kickbacks"!
The bid price is high
Not long ago, Ericsson due to the decline in 5G performance in the domestic and foreign markets, in order to maintain the flow of funds, large layoffs, for China Telecom 5G network equipment large orders are also Ericsson is very eager, so in the bidding quotation will occupy a lot of advantages, on the other hand, Huawei's bidding quotation in the industry level is a relatively high level; and domestic operators are recognized low-frequency 5G frequency band, mainly economical, wireless data rate is much higher than 4G, which is also Ericsson's advantage.
According to insiders, the investment cost of 5G network equipment is huge, but the application of 5G network is very small, and the investment income is not proportional!
Equipment quality
Huawei and Ericsson's 5G equipment has its own advantages and characteristics in terms of technical strength, equipment performance, global deployment experience, and security, while Ericsson's 5G equipment has excellent performance in terms of network stability, security, and reliability, and has good energy-saving and environmental protection characteristics.
Market conditions
Network communication industry equipment are involved in domestic and foreign enterprises, the history of the communications industry bidding are involved in Ericsson, Huawei, ZTE, Lokia, Datang Mobile and other manufacturers won the bid, through this domestic market in exchange for foreign markets, so that domestic enterprises more convenient to enter the European and other markets, if behind closed doors will only be counterproductive, let foreign companies enter the communications industry can promote domestic technology more in line with the world, provide a large number of jobs, foreign companies job treatment is good.
What is the strength of Ericsson's history
Ericsson is a very strong company involved in business communication network systems, professional telecommunication services, patent licensing, enterprise systems, operation support systems (OSS) and business support systems (BSS). Ericsson's 2G, 3G, 4G, and 5G wireless communication networks are widely used and deployed by major operators around the world. In the past, China Mobile used Ericsson network equipment to access the 2G network, with high network coverage and strong signal stability.
For a long time, the three major domestic operators will divide part of the bid share to Ericsson, Huawei, ZTE and Datang Mobile and other enterprises, this time Ericsson defeated Huawei to obtain the first share of China Telecom's 5G network equipment large order, there is no "exclusion" and "rebate" problem, mainly the impact of quotation, we all know that the current 5G network equipment frequency band coverage is low, need to build more than one base station to meet the coverage, the amount of investment is huge.
Isn't it good for many foreign companies to enter the country? At least provide a large number of jobs for you to choose from, the benefits and salaries of foreign companies are good, if they are all local enterprises, it is an outsourcing position, what do you think?