With the rapid development of human civilization and the continuous improvement of the economic level, the cost of living is also rising, and the cost of daily expenses, raising and educating children is increasing.
On the contrary, this view gives people the feeling that only rich people can fall in love and start a family, and love and family belong exclusively to rich people.
If you look at it from some angles, it is indeed irresponsible to assume that you have no money and your own life is a problem, but you still have to get married and have children. It is indeed irresponsible to the other half if you have a huge debt, but you still want to get married, of course, if the other party is still willing to get married, it is another matter.
But if you insist on having children if you don't have money, who will raise the children?
Since you give birth to a child, you should take on the responsibility of raising and educating them, and some people can't afford to raise their children after they are born, so they drop out of school early, which is extremely irresponsible.
Although it is somewhat realistic to use money to measure whether to get married and have children, the economy does determine the fate of children and families, so what do netizens in the comment area think of "don't get married and have children if you don't have money"? The answer is almost one-sided, and it's quite surprising.
Some netizens said: I think modern young people are more sober and responsible than young people in the past. The attitude of knowing how to be responsible for oneself and for one's children is commendable. It is not selfishness to live your life first and think about having children when you have the ability to raise them, it is a sign of responsibility.
If you don't have money, you really don't want to have children, if you hurt your children, you will also suffer yourself!
People who don't have money don't even have the qualifications to get married!
Not having money to have children is irresponsible for the society, the family, yourself and your children's growth and future, so do what you can...
Judging from the comments of netizens, everyone still agrees that if you have money and ability to get married and have children, don't have children if you don't have the ability, which is irresponsible.
Of course, this view will also bring some disadvantages to social development, although the domestic population is more than 1.4 billion, but because of the serious aging, the birth rate is also declining, once it falls below 0, the population is in negative growth, which means that the future labor force is insufficient, and it also has an impact on the country's economic development.
For getting married and having children, I think everyone should be open and transparent before marriage, don't hide anything, for having children, if the family conditions are not good, have one child, don't have more, and the family economic situation is better to have two and three children.
For families with poor economic conditions, don't hold the idea that you won't give up without having a boy, this is a manifestation of selfishness.
My wife is the third child in the family, in 2000, she has a total of 4 children in the family, the fourth is the younger brother, the family conditions are very poor, the parents have no regular jobs, usually set up stalls, can not make any money, but his father has to give birth to a son, saying that the brothers in the family have sons, but his family will not be looked down upon.
I have to say, this kind of thinking is really ridiculous, pedantic, my wife said that she was born and was sent out, because at that time to grasp family planning, tossing and turning to several families, and then not strict before being taken back, and the primary school did not want her to study, because the family really couldn't afford it, and then she still relied on picking up garbage and bottles, plus the eldest sister in the family went to work, and then continued to study.
As a post-00s, I didn't ask for 5 cents from my family in elementary school, which shows what poverty looks like. It can only be said that such a father is really selfish, and he can't afford to raise a child when he has children, and he is really a father in vain.
I think that whether to have children if you don't have money depends on the family situation, you can have fewer children if you don't have money, and you have to be responsible for giving birth, rather than leaving it alone.
Of course, I personally think that having a child is still necessary to earn more money and be fully prepared, I also want to give my children a better life, I don't know what everyone in the comment area thinks, do you think you should get married and have children if you don't have money?