Recently, I accidentally saw a video of APEC Secretary-General Yu Qi apologizing to netizens on a certain platform. Is it not official prestige or impropriety for an official to apologize to the public for inappropriate remarks and domineering?
Yu Qi and her husband drove an embassy-licensed car and parked on a motorway at an intersection, causing a traffic jam, and the drivers behind them honked their horns and condemned in unison. Some righteous and outspoken people came forward to negotiate, and Yu Qi said disrespectfully: Do you know that this is the embassy's car? Know about diplomatic immunity? I don't care about you! I didn't want this key evidence to be grabbed by anyone, so the small video was posted on the Internet, causing an uproar.
First of all, the APEC leader criticized Yu Qi, as a national cadre and the leader of an international organization, to engage in specialization and scold people in public, which is obviously unseemly, and is not tolerated by the party's supervision and discipline, and requires her to apologize in public. Secondly, the Beijing Municipal Traffic Police Bureau dealt with Yu Qi and his wife, and fined them in accordance with the provisions of the Road Traffic Law. As a cadre who is already a half-old, is it a loss of prestige to make a review on the Internet?
Many netizens believe that in today's situation of strictly governing the party and strictly managing cadres, Yu Qi's behavior is really damaging to the party's reputation, and it is appropriate for her to publicly apologize on the Internet. On the road of governing the country according to law, no one can engage in specialization, especially some leading cadres, who should all the more abide by party discipline and state law and set an example for the masses of the people, so that our cause can develop even better!