All content in this article is based on official and reliable sources, and the specific information is detailed in the article
Preface
At present, the trend of the situation in the Middle East has attracted the attention of people around the world.
The siege of many forces has caused Israel to decline, and even so, Israel is not to be outdone.
While the situation in the Middle East is heating up, NATO seems to be unable to resist its restlessness and has issued a nuclear threat to China.
So what kind of message did NATO send? How will China respond?
The Israeli command was bombed
Since the outbreak of a new round of Palestinian-Israeli conflict in October last year, Israel has frequently launched attacks with various forces in the Middle East, and the trend has become more and more severe recently.
On June 15, local time, Israel was attacked by three forces in one day.
Lebanon and Israel have always been at odds with each other, not to mention the death of a senior Lebanese official by a rocket fired by the Israeli army.
In retaliation for the Israeli army's actions, Lebanon launched a large-scale attack on Israel in the days following the deaths of senior officials.
On the 15th, it launched an attack on a military facility in northern Israel, and in addition to this, an attack drone was also sent to another military base to carry out precision strikes.
Since the 12th, Lebanon has fired nearly 300 rockets and dozens of attack drones at Israel's conservative estimates.
At the same time, Iraqi militia forces attacked Israel's largest port on the same day.
But one of the deadliest attacks on Israeli forces was the bombing of an armored vehicle in southern Israel.
(Source: Yunnan.com, June 16, 2024 - Israel was attacked on a large scale)
Israel suffers a "deadly attack"
On 15 June, during the Israeli attack on Rafah, an armoured vehicle carrying soldiers was hit by an explosion.
The explosion was so devastating that the eight soldiers on board the armored vehicle did not survive, and it was even difficult to identify and locate the bodies of the victims.
According to the Israeli army's investigation, the explosion was caused by an explosive device or an anti-tank missile buried in the area.
The casualties of the Israeli army this time are among the heaviest since the outbreak of the new round of Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
In the aftermath, the Qassam Brigades, an armed wing of Hamas, claimed that they had used Yasin 105 rockets to launch attacks on Israeli armored vehicles.
The statement also said they attacked a military bulldozer, causing it to catch fire.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu expressed "deep disgust" at it and said they would continue to hold on to the war.
On the same day, Israeli ground forces continued their attacks in Rafah, killing at least 19 Palestinians.
(Source: Global Times, June 17, 2024 – 8 people killed, Israeli forces suffered the deadliest single attack)
Israel's actions in Rafah also illustrate that Rafah is no longer the last pure land.
Prior to this, Israel had said that they were going to attack Rafah, but the United States did not agree.
Today, Israel's behaviour shows that they have begun to attack Rafah.
In this way, there is a serious threat to the civilian population of Rafah, and there is simply no room to survive in a critical situation.
Moreover, with the character of the Israeli army, would not the anger of the death of the soldiers be vented on the civilians of Rafah?
The actions of the Israeli army are undoubtedly dragging civilians into an endless abyss, and the situation in the Middle East will further heat up.
NATO issued a nuclear threat against China
In addition to Israel's madness, NATO is now particularly arrogant.
NATO Secretary-General announced on the 17th that NATO countries are discussing the deployment of more nuclear weapons.
As soon as this remark came out, it was simply a blatant threat, and needless to say, the objects of the threat were naturally China and Russia.
To be honest, the biggest threat to NATO at the moment is Russia, but for China they will not choose to stop containment.
According to relevant media reports, the United States has deployed about 100 B61 nuclear bombs in five countries.
This is simply the United States seeking nuclear hegemony and wanting to threaten Russia with nuclear weapons.
However, the head of Russia immediately responded to the incident, saying that the behavior of NATO, led by the United States, is to escalate the tension again.
Putin also said that the current situation has not yet reached the point where nuclear weapons are to be used, and countries around the world should not discuss the use of nuclear weapons for no reason.
(Source: International Online, June 18, 2024 - NATO says it is discussing the deployment of more nuclear weapons Russia: Another escalation of tensions)
After threatening Russia, NATO, of course, will not forget about China.
At the previous G7 summit, China was not present, but it was able to mention China 28 times, and even issued a joint statement, most of which was aimed at China.
In the past, the United States has repeatedly mentioned in public that China supports Russia in military operations, and now it is bringing up this issue again.
At the G7 summit, it was once again said that "China will not be allowed to aid Russia", otherwise measures will be taken to sanction China.
On June 17, local time, the NATO Secretary-General announced that China had "shared a lot of technology" with Russia, and these technologies would happen to be used by Russia to attack Ukraine.
In addition, in his speech, he continued to advocate sanctions against China, claiming that the semiconductor and other technologies that Russia buys from China will be used to produce missiles, among other things.
He even openly threatened China with "economic costs" "if it continues to support Russia's military operations."
(Source: Observer.com, June 18, 2024 - NATO Secretary General threatens that China will pay an "economic price" if it supports Russia again)
The statements of the NATO Secretary General are nothing but slander.
As everyone in the world knows, China has always maintained the attitude of a third-party country in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, never taking sides with the other side, and even promoting peace talks.
The exchanges between China and Russia are normal economic and trade exchanges, but they are frequently slandered as "aiding Russia".
Now it is even more blatant that we will pay an "economic price".
But anyone with a discerning eye can see that the so-called "economic cost" is the threat of nuclear weapons, otherwise why put the two things on the same day?
NATO wants to kill two birds with one stone with nuclear weapons, but neither China nor Russia is a fish to be slaughtered, and once NATO has any provocative behavior, it will definitely carry out severe counterattacks.
epilogue
China is a peace-loving country that never causes trouble, but that doesn't mean we're afraid of things.
U.S. nuclear weapons could not threaten China during the period of resisting US aggression and aiding Korea, let alone now.
We also have what you have, don't want to threaten the mainland with nuclear weapons.
On the contrary, the United States should carefully consider whether it will end up betraying its relatives if it blindly seeks a hegemonic position.