For your better reading and interactive experience, in order for you to be able to see more content in time, click "Follow" and I will update more wonderful stories and share different wonderful moments for you every day
Text | Grasshoppers say entertainment
Edit | Grasshoppers say entertainment
Recently, Russia and Ukraine have fought fiercely in the direction of Volchansk and Liptsey.
The Ukrainian army reinforced about 15 battalions and counter-offensive since May 20, intending to seize many villages and towns to create an environment for Zelensky to participate in the meeting.
However, the Ukrainian side overcharged and fell into the conspiracy of the Russian army, the casualties increased, the quality of personnel declined, and the passive situation continued.
In the fission of Eastern Europe, the actions and purposes of the Ukrainian army are like a beacon in the fog, which not only shows the determination to fight, but also reflects the subtlety of strategy.
Since May 20, the first reinforcements have poured into the Kharkiv region, signaling a counteroffensive of unprecedented proportions.
Around June 5, this momentum finally broke out, targeting villages and towns such as Herbock, intending to open up a new situation in Volchansk and pave a glorious political path for President Volodymyr Zelensky's upcoming NATO summit.
The course of this campaign is not determined by the will of Ukraine alone.
On the other side of the ocean, the attitude of the United States is like an invisible hand, plucking the strings of war.
On June 18, White House National Security Council Coordinator Kirby's remarks were like a pebble thrown into a calm lake, stirring up a thousand waves.
He openly expressed his expectations for Ukraine's accession to NATO, but the conditions were sharp as knives - Russia must first be defeated on the battlefield.
As soon as this remark came out, international public opinion suddenly boiled over, and doubts and interpretations poured in.
Some people see it as a hidden pressure on the Zelensky government by the United States, which is intended to prompt Ukraine to continue to consume resources and plunge Russia into a quagmire, but it is actually a strategic urge to maintain "stability on the front".
In the face of Ukraine's joint arrangement with the West, Russia has shown the tenacity and wisdom of its military machine.
For five days and nights, the Russian army launched a fierce air attack on the strong defense system of the Ukrainian army, and heavy aerial bombs rained down like drops, aiming to weaken the Ukrainian army's will to resist.
On the Kharkiv border, there are many artillery units, which not only ensures the unimpeded flow of logistics supplies, but also improves the accuracy and efficiency of strikes by increasing the base number of precision-guided artillery shells.
In particular, it is worth mentioning the use of the "Mara Farm" tactic, which, with its unique flexibility and brutal effectiveness, has become a killer weapon for the Russian army to resist the Ukrainian offensive.
Through the skillful pulling of the battle line, the Russian army not only effectively reduced its own losses, but also led the Ukrainian army into a carefully set artillery trap step by step.
In the smoke of gunpowder on the battlefield, the current situation and future trend of the battle between the two sides are gradually emerging.
The Ukrainian army seems to be caught in the "encirclement" carefully woven by the Russian army in each charge, and each attempt to break through may exacerbate its own casualties, forming a dangerous "dead loop".
With the deepening of the campaign, the problem of the personnel quality of the Ukrainian army has become increasingly prominent, especially the territorial defense forces, whose combat effectiveness has declined, making the situation in Kharkiv more and more unfavorable to the Ukrainian side.
The core of the "Mara Farm" tactic is to take advantage of the uncertainty of the battlefield and continuously deplete the enemy's vital forces through tactical retreats and counterattacks.
Whenever the Ukrainian army tried to pursue the victory, the Russian army cleverly retreated, leaving the fruits of victory seemingly at their fingertips, but in fact reserved space for artillery fire.
Once the Ukrainian army advances, what awaits them is a baptism of intensive artillery fire; When retreating, the Russian infantry quickly filled the gap, making every counteroffensive of the Ukrainian army seem futile and fall into a "dilemma".
The counteroffensive of the Ukrainian army and the response of Russia constitute a complex and delicate chess game in this conflict.
Ukraine's strategic intentions are clear, but the path to realization has been bumpy due to external intervention and internal challenges.
The attitude and influence of the United States are like a weather vane, affecting the delicate balance of the situation on the battlefield.
The Russian army, with its profound military heritage and flexible tactics, has demonstrated its resilience and creativity in modern warfare.
In this land baptized by war, every move of each side has a profound impact on the direction of the war and the ultimate prospect of peace.
In this contest, which is intertwined with national will and military wisdom, the contest between the two sides is far more than a hand-to-hand battle on the front line, but also a multi-dimensional contest involving strategic planning, information warfare, and international public opinion.
While the Ukrainian army has suffered heavy losses, it has also shown a certain tactical adaptability and tenacious spirit of resistance.
They took advantage of the terrain and combined with advanced weapons aided by the West to try to build a solid defensive line in the local area, harass the Russian army in a small-scale and rapid raid, and tried to break the rhythm of the "Mara Farm" tactics and reduce unnecessary frontal encounters.
At the same time, the diplomatic efforts of the Ukrainian government in the international arena cannot be ignored.
Through small victories on the battlefield or the negative effects of the actions of the Russian army, the Zelensky government actively demonstrates its determination to fight and the serious challenges it faces to the international community, so as to win more sympathy and substantive support.
The NATO summit has become an important time node, and Ukraine is trying to use this platform to turn battlefield sacrifices into diplomatic bargaining chips, push the international community to impose tougher sanctions on Russia, and obtain more military aid and technical support.
The Russian side is not reactive.
In addition to demonstrating its powerful firepower and tactical innovation capabilities at the military level, Russia also attaches importance to the use of information warfare and psychological warfare, and shapes an international public opinion environment favorable to itself by controlling the flow of information.
Russian media frequently report on "liberation operations" in eastern Ukraine, emphasizing the protection of civilians and the reconstruction of infrastructure, as a way to counter Western accusations and win support from the population at home and abroad.
It is worth noting that as the war continues, the economic warfare outside the battlefield also becomes increasingly intense.
Although the prolongation of Western sanctions has put pressure on the Russian economy, it has also prompted Russia to speed up economic restructuring and find alternative markets and partners, showing a certain degree of resilience.
Ukraine's economy, which is at risk of a severe recession due to the war and has become more dependent on international aid, has added additional complications to its position at the negotiating table.
All in all, this conflict is not only a direct collision of military strength, but also an in-depth contest of comprehensive national strength between the two sides in the political, economic, diplomatic and other fields.
Every action, every decision, can trigger a ripple effect in a delicate balance that can rewrite the final outcome of the conflict.
At a time when the dawn of peace is still far away, how to find the way to reconciliation in the fog of war is a test of the political wisdom and determination of all parties.
(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any doubt about the incident, it will be deleted or changed immediately after contact.