If you think it's good, just click "Follow".
Copywriting丨Xiao Er
Editor丨Xiao Er
At the 2024 graduation ceremony, Li Yifei, a nuclear physics major, stood out for his brilliant speech and outstanding qualifications.
However, as the Internet fermented, more fierce information about her was exposed.
She was born in an artistic family, and she scored extra points in the college entrance examination with her dulcimer expertise, and she actually majored in electrical engineering at Xi'an Jiaotong University.
After graduating in 19, he worked in a state-owned enterprise and got married, and then because he was tired of the atmosphere, he was transferred to the nuclear physics engineering major.
Shockingly, she was accused of having a chaotic love life, having entanglements with many people, and was about to marry a new leader.
She was exposed to academic misconduct, bad style, and profit from improper relationships, and was collectively reported by the research group, which is embarrassing.
When evaluating Li Yifei, some people compared him to Miss Qian, an "academic Daji".
Ms. Chin has been widely spotted for her misconduct in academia.
The analogy is not appropriate.
While both involve issues of academic integrity, Li's case is more complex.
He didn't get involved in academic misconduct at the outset, but gradually revealed the problem after a series of negative revelations.
His speech at the commencement ceremony also showed his passion and pursuit for an academic career.
In evaluating Li Yifei, we need to look at the problem more objectively and comprehensively.
Li Yifei, as a graduate student majoring in nuclear physics, at the graduation ceremony, he expressed his firm belief in taking root in the northwest and contributing his youth to nuclear engineering.
Then a series of negative revelations gradually surfaced.
These revelations include problems such as chaotic love life, academic misconduct, and bad work style.
Among them, the most striking is Li Yifei's special relationship with his mentor and his misconduct in academic achievements.
These revelations have raised serious questions about Li Yifei's academic integrity.
In the face of doubts, Li Yifei and his research team did not give a clear response in a timely manner.
This collective silence has further escalated the controversy.
In contrast, the attention received by the secondary school students far exceeded this incident, which undoubtedly makes people feel that the moat of the "academic community" is unfathomable.
In such cases, it is particularly important to investigate in a timely manner and give a clear explanation.
The introduction of a third-party agency to conduct an investigation can ensure impartiality and objectivity, thereby restoring the truth.
As the investigation deepened, Li Yifei's negative revelations gradually increased.
In addition to the confusion in his love life, his misconduct in academic achievements has also attracted widespread attention.
According to the news, Li Yifei relied on his special relationship with his tutor to obtain academic resources, dominate the first academic achievements in his grade, and let his fellow senior brothers do things for him.
These actions seriously violated the principle of academic honesty and raised questions about Li Yifei's academic ability.
The main points of doubt on the Internet also include the lack of paper results and non-first authorship, the plagiarism of academic achievements that causes depression among teachers and students, the improper relationship with the "second-in-command", the large cross-border majors, and the questioning of the admission process.
These problems not only involve Li Yifei's personal academic integrity, but also reflect the problems existing in the current academic evaluation system.
After an in-depth understanding of Li Yifei's background and experience, we found that he did not start with a background in nuclear physics.
In fact, he comes from an artistic family, and his parents are related to the dulcimer.
During the college entrance examination, he entered Xi'an Jiaotong University with extra points for his dulcimer expertise, majoring in electrical engineering.
After graduating and working in a state-owned enterprise and getting married for a while, he got tired of the atmosphere of state-owned enterprises and decided to go to graduate school.
Eventually, he applied for the electrical engineering major, but his score was not enough and he was transferred to the nuclear physics engineering major.
This experience raises more questions about Li's academic background and motivations.
In response to Li Yifei's controversy, we need to conduct in-depth analysis and reflection.
Academic integrity is the cornerstone of academia, and any violation of this principle should be condemned and punished.
We need to pay attention to the problems existing in the academic evaluation system, and avoid over-pursuing the number and impact factor of papers and ignoring the academic quality.
We should also strengthen the education and guidance of young scholars and help them establish correct academic concepts and values.
We should also reflect on the collective silence of the "academic community".
In the face of controversy, the academic community should remain open and transparent, investigate in a timely manner and give a clear statement.
This can not only maintain the reputation and credibility of the academic community, but also promote the healthy development of academic research.
We need to recognize the importance of PR talent in the research community.
In today's increasingly developed science and technology, the dissemination and promotion of scientific research achievements are of great significance for promoting scientific and technological progress and social development.
We need to cultivate more research talents with public relations skills, so that they can better communicate with the public, disseminate scientific research results, and promote the popularization of academic research.
As we continue to discuss the Li Yifei incident and the academic integrity issues it raises, we have to face a more grim reality: that is, the "unspoken rules" and "chains of interests" in the academic circle.
These invisible forces often affect the independence and impartiality of academic research, and may even cause some young scholars to lose their way in the pursuit of academic success.
We need to realize that the academic circle is not a pure land, and there are also complex interpersonal relationships such as power struggles and interest transfers.
These relationships are often closely related to the allocation of academic resources, project applications, and paper publications.
In this environment, some scholars may choose to obtain academic resources through improper means, or even sacrifice their academic integrity in exchange for short-term benefits.
We also need to pay attention to the training and guidance of young scholars in the academic community.
In the process of pursuing academic achievements and influence, some young scholars may be pressured and tempted by their mentors, peers, etc., causing them to ignore the essence and value of academic research.
We should strengthen the education and guidance of young scholars, help them establish correct academic concepts and values, and clarify the true meaning and value of academic research.
We should also strengthen the supervision and punishment of academic misconduct.
We should resolutely crack down on and punish those behaviors that violate the principle of academic integrity and infringe on the rights and interests of others.
We also need to establish a sound academic evaluation system and supervision mechanism to ensure the impartiality and objectivity of academic research.
We need to recognize the importance of public relations talents in the scientific research community and strengthen the cultivation of relevant talents.
In the information age, the dissemination and promotion of scientific research results is of great significance to enhance academic influence and promote the popularization of academic research.
We need to cultivate more research talents with public relations skills, so that they can better communicate with the public, disseminate scientific research results, and promote the further development of academic research.
The Li Yifei incident has brought us profound reflection and enlightenment.
We should strengthen the construction of academic integrity, improve the academic evaluation system, strengthen the education and guidance of young scholars, and cultivate public relations talents in the scientific research community.
Only in this way can we ensure the healthy development of academic research and make greater contributions to the progress and prosperity of society.
(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any doubt about the incident, it will be deleted or changed immediately after contact.