Please click on the word "follow" above before reading, and we will provide you with more valuable related content in the future, thank you for your support.
(Text/Xiao Xingjia, the headline was first published, it is forbidden to use AI to recreate or wash the manuscript, and infringement must be investigated)
Speaking of which kind of electric car should be eliminated, I recently swiped a video of a netizen, he thinks that the shared electric vehicles that are now full of streets are the most important models that should be eliminated, why do you say that? There are 4 reasons, let's take a look, whether it makes sense!
The shortcomings of shared electric vehicles in 4 aspects
I believe that many people have seen and even used shared electric vehicles, it is in many cities, it can be said that the streets are all over the street, why do some netizens think that if you want to eliminate electric vehicles, shared electric vehicles should be eliminated, because it has 4 deficiencies.
1. There is no rearview mirror, lack of sufficient safety guarantee;
2. Many shared electric vehicles do not even have license plates and lack the qualifications to go on the road;
3. The indiscriminate parking of shared electric vehicles affects the cityscape and road traffic;
4. The helmet wearing rate is very low, because it is a shared helmet, cyclists are worried about health problems, and rarely wear helmets;
Shared electric vehicles in the above four aspects, are not as good as our household electric vehicles, then, if you want to eliminate a class of electric vehicles, it is natural to think that the most should be eliminated is the sharing of electric vehicles.
Why shared electric vehicles are being developed
Since the sharing of electric vehicles in so many aspects, there are deficiencies, why can now be seen all over the street, this is because, the existence of shared electric vehicles, does have a practical role, summary has two points, to promote the development of electric vehicles.
The formation and development of the market is based on the needs of consumers, the development of shared electric vehicles, naturally also from the public's demand for cars, although the sharing of electric vehicles has shortcomings, but the convenience of travel brought by vehicles, is still obvious to all, many people travel short distances, or very favor the use of shared electric vehicles.
In addition to market needs, sharing electric vehicles is actually the result of diversification of means of transportation, since the rise of the mobile Internet, the diversification of means of transportation is the trend, such as online car-hailing, and then such as sharing electric vehicles, this new type of travel tool, is a complement to traditional public transportation, taxi, but also for the improvement of the urban public transport system.
Small connoisseur's point of view: shared electric vehicles and household electric vehicles can coexist, and they are not eliminated
Of course, in response to everyone's discussion, which kind of electric vehicle should be eliminated, the premise is that a certain one must be eliminated, but the opinion of small experts is that whether it is a shared electric vehicle or a household electric vehicle, it should not be eliminated, and the status quo is the same.
Although the current management of electric vehicles is strict and standardized, the purpose is to make electric vehicles travel safer, and the traffic management department does not take the elimination of electric vehicles as the purpose of governance.
Moreover, from the point of view of the regulations, shared electric vehicles and household electric vehicles are non-motor vehicles, and the standards for implementation on the road are the same, such as the same speed limit, the same requirement to wear helmets, and the road can not violate traffic rules, otherwise they will be punished.
All in all, whether it is a shared electric vehicle, or a household electric vehicle, they are strictly managed means of transportation, but at the same time, there is no clear requirement to eliminate the means of transportation, small experts believe that it should not be, there is no need to eliminate, everyone can use it with confidence on the premise of complying with the requirements on the road. What do you think about this? Everyone is welcome to comment and communicate.