Kill all new energy vehicles with a stick and not allow them to enter the underground garage, although this is a bit nonsense, but what else can be done? Recently, I see that everyone has been talking about this matter, and the interesting thing is that many people are very supportive of this decision, but brothers, can we really solve the problem just by supporting it?
Where are the roots? No one on the whole network dared to say that the first cause of the incident was that a new energy vehicle in a community in Huizhou spontaneously combusted in an underground garage, and then ignited the vehicles parked next to it, causing heavy losses. There is a detail in this, the manufacturer has a test for battery safety, called BMS, which will collect data remotely through this, and once a battery problem is detected, it will be automatically reminded.
But this data transmission needs a network, and the general basement signal is poor, and a lot of data cannot be transmitted at all, and then the hidden danger occurs! So why are more and more places not allowing new energy vehicles to enter the basement? To put it bluntly, you have to know that when it comes to spontaneous combustion, the property has to bear a little responsibility regardless of whether it is responsible or not.
To be honest, spontaneous combustion has nothing to do with consumers, and it has nothing to do with property, but I really haven't heard of domestic car spontaneous combustion manufacturers paying, but Korea amazed me this time, Korea a Mercedes-Benz EQE spontaneously combusted, resulting in damage to 140 cars, Mercedes-Benz paid them 4.5 billion won, for which I can only hehe! Therefore, this kind of decision made by the property seems to be discriminatory, but there is no way to do it, whether the car company can take responsibility for the vehicle, maybe it will become a big topic in the future!