laitimes

Is Academician Sun's criticism of Huawei's monopoly justified, or is he poking Huawei's backbone in the back?

Is Academician Sun's criticism of Huawei's monopoly justified, or is he poking Huawei's backbone in the back?

Recently, the video of Academician Sun Ninghui of the Chinese Academy of Sciences criticizing Huawei's monopoly has been very popular on the Internet, and I have also watched the video content, to be honest, it is somewhat unbelievable. It's really hard for me to believe that these words could come out of the mouth of an academician, so is Academician Sun's criticism of Huawei really justified? Or is this poking Huawei's backbone in the back?

To answer this question, we have to first look at what Academician Sun said. First of all, Academician Sun said: Huawei is to engage in closure and monopoly, and it is best for you not to do it, just contribute all the technology to me.

Is Academician Sun's criticism of Huawei's monopoly justified, or is he poking Huawei's backbone in the back?

For Academician Sun's words, to be honest, I don't understand, if there is a choice, how can Huawei do this? The reason why Huawei has vigorously developed systems and chips in recent years is not because of the so-called globalization and the so-called openness? Besides, what achievements have Academician Sun made over the years? When Huawei was cut off from supplying systems and chips, Huawei didn't have a monopoly at that time, but did Huawei have any decent systems and chips for Huawei to use at that time?

Now, Huawei has learned from the pain, vigorously developed the system and chips, and achieved good results, the Hongmeng system has become the world's third largest mobile phone operating system, and has also solved the manufacturing problem of domestic 7nm chips, but now it's good, you Academician Sun said that Huawei is engaged in monopoly, do you want Huawei to abolish its martial arts?

Is Academician Sun's criticism of Huawei's monopoly justified, or is he poking Huawei's backbone in the back?

Academician Sun also said that Huawei is a Chinese-style monopoly, and it is difficult to fight against Western-style monopoly. For this statement, for the time being, we cannot refute it, after all, Western-style monopoly refers to the joint monopoly of European and United States countries to engage in monopoly and technological blockade, and Huawei is only gathering the strength of domestic enterprises, so it is indeed unknown whether it can finally compete.

However, although I can't be sure whether the Huawei model can succeed, I know that in the past ten or twenty years, when domestic companies are fighting their own battles, the domestic chip and system fields have always been like a pool of stagnant water, and there are no achievements.

In my opinion, in the past five years, Huawei has proven that the Huawei model does work. As for Academician Sun's accusation of Huawei, to put it bluntly, he is poking at Huawei's backbone. If you have the ability, then make an advanced system and chip, don't work all day long, you can't do anything, but you always accuse others of monopolizing and delaying your research.

Is Academician Sun's criticism of Huawei's monopoly justified, or is he poking Huawei's backbone in the back?

As Zhao Benshan said in his sketch: "Don't always complain about the bad environment, what's the matter?" Isn't the environment bad wherever you go? Are you the one who destroys the environment"?

As an academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, he has mastered the top scientific research resources in China, and there are a large number of elite talents under his hands, and he also holds a large amount of national scientific research funds every year. Because it would make them look very incompetent! What do you think?