Iran's 180 missiles are lonely? Israel will certainly retaliate, and there will be three serious consequences
Iran's firing of about 180 missiles at Israel is not just a simple retaliatory action, but the latest chapter in the geopolitical game in the Middle East. It sheds light on the region's complex and deep-seated contradictions, foreshadowing possible upheaval and uncertainty ahead.
The attack took place on the occasion of Rosh Hashanah, and its symbolism cannot be ignored. By choosing this time, Iran is not only retaliating for the deaths of Hamas and Allah leaders, but also sending a tough message to Israel and the entire Western world. It's a provocation, a declaration, and a dangerous gamble.
Although Iran claims that most of the missiles hit Israel military bases, this claim is not credible from the information available. A large number of videos show that many missiles fell in no man's land. This may be a reflection of Iran's backwardness in missile technology, or it may be deliberate to create panic rather than cause substantial damage. In any case, this "thunder and rain" attack method highlights Iran's lack of military strength.
Israel's response is crucial. In the face of such provocations, Israel cannot remain indifferent. Reprisals are almost inevitable and likely to be more violent than ever. Hardliners in Israel have seen the attack as a "declaration of war" and have called for strikes on Iran's leadership, military installations, and even nuclear facilities. This will undoubtedly exacerbate regional tensions and may even trigger a larger conflict.
The role of United States is also worth paying attention to. Although the United States was informed of Iran's attack plans in advance and assisted Israel in intercepting it, this does not mean that United States is happy to see the situation escalate. United States' strategic goal in the Middle East is to maintain regional stability and avoid direct conflict with Iran. However, Israel's retaliatory actions could drag United States into a quagmire and force it to make difficult choices.
From a more macro perspective, the attack is a continuation of a long-standing power struggle in the Middle East. The game between Iran and Israel, and the powers that support them, has never stopped. Iran is trying to expand its influence in the region by supporting organizations such as Hamas and Allah and challenge Israel's regional hegemony. Israel, on the other hand, views Iran as the biggest security threat and has spared no effort to curb its nuclear program and regional expansion.
The missile attack also exposed the fragility of the security apparatus in the Middle East. Despite a United States military presence and a strong Israel military presence, regional conflicts continue to frequent, and the peace process is struggling. This reminds us that military force alone cannot solve fundamental problems and that political dialogue and diplomatic efforts remain crucial.
Looking ahead, the situation in the Middle East is fraught with uncertainty. Israel's retaliation could trigger a chain reaction that could escalate regional conflicts. And Iran's tough posture also indicates that it will not easily give up its ambitions in the region. Under the complicated regional pattern and the game of various forces, the road to peace in the Middle East is still long and bumpy.
The repercussions of this event will be far-reaching. Not only will it exacerbate regional tensions, but it could also have a significant impact on global energy markets, international relations, and the geopolitical landscape. We must closely monitor developments and be prepared for all possible scenarios.
More importantly, we need to think about how we can break this cycle of violence and find a path to peace. This requires all parties to demonstrate political wisdom and courage to resolve differences and build mutual trust through dialogue and negotiation. Only in this way can real peace and stability be brought to the Middle East region.