laitimes

Lei Jun himself responded with 3 expressions

Lei Jun himself responded with 3 expressions

During the National Day holiday, a large number of spoof videos of "Lei Jun AI dubbing" appeared on the short video platform.

In the video, "Lei Jun" sharply commented on hot topics such as traffic jams and holidays, including some indecent abuse. Some netizens ridiculed: "I was scolded by 'Lei Jun' for 7 days on the National Day Internet. ”

In addition to complaining, "Lei Jun" in the video also said that he wanted to invest in such and such a university. Up to now, there have been more than 100 million views on related topics on the platform.

In Lei Jun's Weibo comment area, in the past few days, people have been leaving messages asking about this matter.

Lei Jun himself responded with 3 expressions
Lei Jun himself responded with 3 expressions
Lei Jun himself responded with 3 expressions
Lei Jun himself responded with 3 expressions

On the evening of October 7, in response to netizens' questions about "why swearing", Lei Jun replied with three angry expressions↓

Lei Jun himself responded with 3 expressions
Lei Jun himself responded with 3 expressions

In this regard, lawyer Lian Dayou, director of Beijing Jingben Law Firm, told reporters that whether it is an ordinary person or a well-known person, without his consent, he used his portrait and voice to edit and synthesize, and even published abusive and defamatory content, which obviously infringed on his relevant civil rights, such as portrait rights and reputation rights.

The Cybersecurity Law, the Data Security Law, the Personal Information Protection Law, the Science and Technology Progress Law and other laws all provide for this. The Interim Measures for the Administration of Generative AI Services, jointly promulgated by the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) and other seven departments and implemented on August 15, 2023, also specifically stipulate the liability of AI that infringes on the rights and interests of personal information.

Lian Dayou's lawyer said that Lei Jun can rely on the provisions of the Civil Code to require the spoof to bear legal responsibilities, including stopping the infringement, publicly apologizing, restoring reputation and compensating for losses. If the prank behavior of the spoof violates the relevant provisions of the Public Security Administration Punishment Law, he or she will also face administrative penalties such as administrative fines and/or administrative detention. In addition, if these spoofs spread rumors and cause serious social impact, they may be in violation of the criminal law.

Source: China Youth Daily

Forward Follow