On the 21st, the official Weibo post certified as a "painter in time and space" posted accusing Wang Glory of plagiarizing his works and saying, "Make so much money, please have an original designer!" Subsequently, #Painted Traveler accused King glory of plagiarism #on Weibo hot search.
From the comparative pictures sent, it can be seen that the material design issued by King Glory on April 14 is indeed "colliding" with the original pictures used by the travelers in time and space on June 27 last year in terms of elements, typography, color matching, etc.
According to the data, "The Painter in Time and Space" is a plot love mobile game with a world view based on the concept of "parallel universe" developed by NetEase, inviting many outstanding painters at home and abroad to participate in the creation, and the game was publicly tested on October 23, 2020 on all platforms.
Later today, the king glory supplier @ full speed network issued an announcement that it noticed that the column announcement map designed by the company for the glory of the king may have similar situations with other product announcement maps, and is urgently investigating the actual situation of the design creation, and will make a full explanation as soon as possible.
A search for #Glory of Kings found that the alleged work had been replaced with a new image.
For this matter, some netizens believe that this is another outsourcing of the pot.
Some netizens also found that the full-speed network of one of the parties to the incident belonged to "senior outsourcing".
This is not the first time that The Glory of Kings has fallen into the vortex of plagiarism. Previously, the "Glory of Kings" IP new tour "Codename: Zero Three" was exposed to be a promotional poster plagiarizing "Original God", which used the material of "Original God" Star Falling Lake. After the incident, the official issued a document and apologized the next day, saying that the incident was mainly a problem with the outsourcing company that produced the poster, and Tencent would seriously deal with the personnel involved in the incident.
In fact, in recent years, there have been many brands that have been copied in the industry, and the brands involved are also diverse, including makeup, skin care products, clothing, etc.
In fact, in the design circle, plagiarism is very difficult to define, and sometimes designers will draw inspiration from excellent works to apply to their own designs, which is understandable. But borrowing is not the same as copying all, in the case of design ideas, design styles, etc. are almost all the same, can this still be regarded as original? Where are the original points?
It's easy to use, but where is the way out for brands without originality? Once or twice can be said to be outsourcing unintentionally, but the frequent "wolf coming" operation is consumed by the brand's own reputation and commercial value.
In addition, any originality is the result of the designer's hard work, and the practice of enjoying the work of others without authorization is not only infuriating, but also loses the favor of a large number of passers-by, which is really not worth the loss.
--end--