This Chongqing day is so hot that you can bake eggs, and the man at the watermelon stall originally wanted to use the door of the Vocational and Technical College of Industry and Trade to send some coolness to the students, but he didn't know that he got into the "melon" incident.
On June 18, a high-profile incident occurred near the Chongqing Vocational and Technical College of Industry and Trade. A disabled couple got into an argument over driving away a stall owner selling watermelons here, and in the end they smashed the stall owner's cart of watermelons, but the stall owner paid 500 yuan out of his own pocket.
It is reported that a stall owner with the online name "Uncle Watermelon" pushed a load of green watermelons and came to the school gate to make a lot of money.
During the dispute, the stall owner was excited, and pushed a disabled woman sitting on the scale, this time it was terrible, the couple seemed to have been ignited a powder keg, and broke out instantly, picked up the watermelon and smashed it towards the "watermelon uncle", for a while, the watermelon splashed everywhere, the red juice flowed, and the scene was called a spectacular!
The stall owner was also unlucky, he wanted to sell melons to make a little money, but he got into trouble with such a pair of "melon tyrants", and in the end, after police mediation, the stall owner had to pay the disabled couple 500 yuan, which was really a loss of watermelon and money!
Couples with disabilities who have a physical disability should not be given the privilege of arbitrarily bullying others.
Moreover, although they are disabled, they are clear-headed, which shows that they are not unreasonable.
The picture below shows that in the fierce dispute, the stall owner's neck was scratched and scarred by the disabled couple, and the stall owner only found it when he returned home, which is really distressing to see.
According to insiders, the disabled couple has been selling fruits here for a long time, and there is a behavior of forced buying and selling, and the stall owner was driven away by them just passing by and selling watermelons for a while, and the couple also kicked other people's cars into the dent before.
Comments from netizens
@伶俐: You pushed him and lost 500, why didn't he pay if he smashed your melon, and compensate according to the price!
Q Daddy: I don't understand, just smash it for nothing, how can you still lose money to the other party!
@Purple Rose: I hope Uncle Watermelon sells watermelons every day, not only watermelons, but also other fruits, to save the children in this school!
@诸葛LED: Don't look at such a person getting 500 yuan, he has lost his small business.
@大海无量全靠浪: Life isn't easy, but it's too much.
In the face of controversy on the Internet, the stall owner posted on social media calling on everyone to look at the matter rationally, he said that there is no problem with the police's handling, and it can be seen clearly in the surveillance, the fault is only that she sat on my name and did not let me go, and he did push people first, and was willing to pay for his impulse. At the same time, he also expressed understanding and tolerance for the couple's behavior.
The stall owner also said that you can't overturn a boatload of people with a rod, there are such people everywhere, of course, no matter where there must still be many good people, Chongqing is very good, everyone is welcome to come to Chongqing to play.
So who won this dispute?
From a material point of view, the stall owner who sold the melon is obviously the loser, not only the watermelon was smashed to pieces, but also had to lose money, but from the spiritual level, although the disabled couple received compensation, they lost their hearts and dignity, they may be able to temporarily monopolize the business of this site, but in the long run, their behavior will only make people stay away.
Legal analysis
From a legal point of view, the stall owner's act of pushing and shoving his disabled wife may constitute a certain tort and need to bear corresponding legal liability. The act of a disabled couple smashing the stall owner's watermelon may constitute the crime of intentional destruction of property, which also needs to be punished by law. However, with the mediation of the police, the two parties were able to reach a settlement and avoid further escalation of the situation, which is undoubtedly a wise choice.
This incident teaches us a truth: physical disability may be sympathetic, but mental disability is contemptible, and no matter who you are, you should respect others and follow the rules, rather than relying on a certain identity to do whatever you want.
Loading...
Finally, I would like to say that since the stall owner who sells watermelons has no objection, saying that there is no problem with the police's handling, admitting that he did push people first and is willing to pay for his impulse, then this matter is not much controversial!
What do you think about this?