Recently, Mr. Ruan, a villager from Tianshui, Gansu Province, was accused of reselling tobacco without a license and sentenced to five years in prison for illegal business operation in the first instance. In the second instance, his lawyer presented evidence to prove that the key evidence for the conviction was forged by the Tobacco Bureau's personnel who came to the door twice in the early morning three years later to make up the photo.
What's going on here? Take a look at the video:
Loading...
After reading it, I believe everyone understands that simply put, it is whether this notice of withdrawal of tobacco license was delivered to the merchant in time at that time, and if there is no evidence to prove it, then this invalid tobacco license is not legally valid. Therefore, in order to get this "proof", there was the act of going to the door of the villagers in the early morning to "make up the evidence".
Interestingly, their behavior happened to be completely filmed by the surveillance at the door! Just imagine, if there is no surveillance, then Mr. Ruan is a dumb eater of Coptis chinensis!
The Tobacco Bureau responded
As public opinion continued to ferment, a staff member of the Tobacco Bureau responded to the incident, saying that at the same time, the Tobacco Bureau also said that there was no legal basis for the "supplementary certificate" and apologized to the villagers involved.
If nothing happens, it represents the Tobacco Bureau, and if something happens, it's a personal behavior, it's 2024, can you change a new trick? In addition, because of the act of "supplementing the certificate", the villagers have been innocently sentenced to five years and fined 60,000 yuan.
Loading...
The central media spoke out
The incident became bigger and bigger, and finally it also alarmed the central media, which set the tone and criticized the matter, pointing out that it was obviously inappropriate to prosecute the defendant and sentence due to insufficient evidence, and the "supplementary evidence" caused the public to question the abuse of rights.
Law enforcement agencies should act strictly in accordance with the law to ensure the fairness and credibility of law enforcement.
Netizens have something to say
What do you think about this, friends?