The "lowliness" of intellectuals and the legitimacy of laymen
In this day and age, there is a disgraceful ethos that has spread among intellectual circles – they are mired in self-satisfaction, no longer interested in true learning and innovation, but desperate for attention and attention at all costs. They reduced their talents to a cheap commodity, used all kinds of means to sell sex, customs, and misery to attract the attention of the public, and finally became complacent in the overwhelming attention and praise, thinking that they were the real intellectual elite.
Such a phenomenon is undoubtedly heart-wrenching. As leaders and role models in society, intellectuals should influence and enlighten others with noble character and profound knowledge, and should not be reduced to a group of vulgar "Internet celebrities" and "eye-catching" commodities. As Professor Xiang Ligang said, "cheapness is the mainstream of intellectuals in this era." This phenomenon not only devalues the social status of intellectuals, but also makes one wonder what exactly are today's intellectuals pursuing?
In contrast, the so-called "layman" appears more legitimate and responsible. For example, as a successful entrepreneur, Professor Xiang Ligang uses his own experience and insights to provide guidance for college students on training plans, which is undoubtedly more valuable and meaningful than those "scumbags" who show off their English skills. As Professor Xiang said, "It's better than a small Internet celebrity!" Similarly, some time ago, the "success masters" who had never worked in a company were severely criticized by economists and Tsinghua professors because they had no practical experience at all, but tried in vain to "teach and solve doubts".
This phenomenon makes people wonder what is the real "knowledge" and "profession", and is it the fancy academic qualifications and titles, or the real insights and insights? Obviously, intellectuals who only "flaunt" their knowledge are far less valuable than some "laymen" with rich practical experience. As Professor Xiang said, "I have never seen them achieve more than they did not speak English well."
Therefore, we should abandon inherent biases and strive to embrace a broader perspective and pattern. A true intellectual should not be easily confused by formalism and impetuous tendencies, but should adhere to academic ethics and carry out research and practice in a down-to-earth manner, so as to benefit society. Only in this way can we truly realize the value and meaning of knowledge, and not fall victim to a group of "lowly qualities".
Attractive:
In this day and age, a sad phenomenon is spreading among intellectual circles – they are indulging in the quagmire of self-satisfaction, no longer focusing on true learning and innovation, but desperate for attention and attention at all costs. Such intellectuals have completely deviated from their original intentions and have been reduced to a group of cheap "Internet celebrities" and "eye-catching" commodities.
This phenomenon is undoubtedly heartbreaking. As leaders and role models in society, intellectuals should influence and enlighten others with noble character and profound knowledge, and should not become a group of vulgar "lowly characters". As Professor Xiang Ligang said, "cheapness is the mainstream of intellectuals in this era." This phenomenon not only devalues the social status of intellectuals, but also makes one wonder what exactly are today's intellectuals pursuing?
In contrast, the so-called "layman" appears more legitimate and responsible. For example, as a successful entrepreneur, Professor Xiang Ligang uses his own experience and insights to provide guidance for college students on training plans, which is undoubtedly more valuable and meaningful than those "scumbags" who show off their English skills. As Professor Xiang said, "It's better than a small Internet celebrity!" Similarly, some time ago, the "success masters" who had never worked in a company were severely criticized by economists and Tsinghua professors because they had no practical experience at all, but tried in vain to "teach and solve doubts".
This phenomenon makes people wonder what is the real "knowledge" and "profession", and is it the fancy academic qualifications and titles, or the real insights and insights? Obviously, intellectuals who only "flaunt" their knowledge are far less valuable than some "laymen" with rich practical experience. As Professor Xiang said, "I have never seen them achieve more than they did not speak English well."
Therefore, we should abandon inherent biases and strive to embrace a broader perspective and pattern. A true intellectual should not be easily confused by formalism and impetuous tendencies, but should adhere to academic ethics and carry out research and practice in a down-to-earth manner, so as to benefit society. Only in this way can we truly realize the value and meaning of knowledge, and not fall victim to a group of "lowly qualities".
Continue to ask questions about true knowledge and expertise
We have already discussed the problems that exist in intellectual circles today, such as the fact that they indulge in the quagmire of self-satisfaction and eye-catching, and abandon the true pursuit of knowledge. In contrast, the so-called "laymen" with rich practical experience are more legitimate and responsible. So, what exactly is true knowledge and expertise?
One might think that knowledge and profession must be built on flashy academic qualifications and titles. But it's not that simple. As Professor Xiang Ligang pointed out, "I have never seen them achieve more than they did not speak English well". This sentence shows an important fact: true knowledge and professionalism are not reflected by showing off academic qualifications and language skills, but more by personal opinions, insight and practical ability.
For example, the "success masters" mentioned above, although they have good academic qualifications, but due to their lack of practical work experience, they try to "teach and solve doubts" to entrepreneurs and officials. This is clearly a form of formalism that is despicable. In contrast, Professor Xiang Ligang's guidance on training programs for college students is more practical and valuable by virtue of his successful entrepreneurial experience. This combination of theory and practice is where the real knowledge and specialization lie.
We can't afford to get too obsessed with fancy titles and degrees and lose sight of something more essential. A true intellectual should possess profound knowledge, noble moral character, and a socially responsible attitude. They should be down-to-earth in their research and practice, rather than sinking into the quagmire of self-satisfaction and eye-catching. Only in this way can knowledge and professionalism truly exert their due value and significance, and benefit society.
Therefore, we should strive to abandon inherent prejudices and misconceptions, and understand the essence of knowledge and profession with a more open and inclusive mind. Let us work together to promote the healthy development of intellectuals, so that true learning and innovation can once again become the leading and powerful force of society.