"Can a bought smart car really be called a smart car?" Lao Wang's words are like a pebble, smashed into the calm lake of the smart car market.
As soon as these words fell, everyone's thoughts began to turn over the river. What exactly is a real smart car? Could it be that all those sold on the market are "pseudo-intelligence"? Why don't you suddenly work with those big words about autonomous driving and Internet of Vehicles? Or have we been kept in the dark?
Let's take a look at it first, what is a smart car? As the name suggests, there are two words: smart. It has to have a brain, be able to think on its own, make decisions according to the road conditions, and give everyone a safe and comfortable experience. However, if even the heart, bones, and brains of the car have to be bought from others, can the car still be called "smart"? I think it's a bit of a hanging.
The technology you buy will give you a tall appearance and a full range of bells and whistles. But when it comes to true intelligence, it's not just foolishness. There's a lot of technical work here! Sensors, controllers, software and hardware, all have to be accurately coordinated, so that there is a play to achieve automatic driving, intelligent navigation and other advanced things. Behind this, it all depends on the top R&D strength and innovation ability.
On the other hand, those companies that are stubborn in independent research and development are powerful. People can keep an eye on market demand, aim at the latest technology trends, and make efforts to engage in targeted R&D and innovation. What they want is to break up the technology, crumple it up, eat it thoroughly, and use it for my use. That's really smart! What should you choose for the smart cars sold on the market now? Do you value the appearance of the bells and whistles, or do you care more about the hard power of the inside? In my opinion, you still have to choose those companies that have real kung fu and real innovation. Such a car not only has black technology and high configuration, but also has genuine intelligent genes.
Of course, we can't just stare at intelligence and not let go. Safety and reliability are the last word. When it comes to driving, I deal with danger every minute. If there's a slight technical glitch, it's no joke. Therefore, the smart car we finally choose must have undergone repeated rigorous tests and the safety is 100% guaranteed.
See what netizens have to say. Some people think that BYD's failure to join forces with Huawei is the biggest loss, and maybe one day it won't be able to sell cars because of this. There are also people who talk about Xiaomi, and think that the assembled car still has to be a real guy, learning from Ren Zhengfei instead of Liu Chuanzhi. Some people also directly support Mr. Wang, saying that he is the leader of domestic cars, with real technology and real research and development, this is the future of domestic cars!
My personal opinion is that a car with a brain is not necessarily "smart". We have to look for cars that have real strength, real kung fu, and can withstand safety tests. Only in this way can we enjoy the beautiful life brought by smart cars in a down-to-earth manner.
So finally, I would like to ask: in the era of smart cars, how to distinguish between real intelligence and pseudo-intelligence? Is it a blind pursuit of lofty concepts and fancy functions, or is it more important to value solid technology and safety assurance? Is it just about the pleasure and freshness, or is it about the real innovation strength and development potential behind it? The purchased technology and independent research and development still have to compete after all? What do you think about this?