Believing in the fraud of the US moon landing is the same kind of person as believing in Jiang Ping, right?
Hello everyone, I'm a little milk cat who loves to bake bread. Here, I wish the friends who read this article a harmonious relationship, good health, and smooth sailing.
On June 25, the Chang'e-6 returner landed accurately in the predetermined area of Siziwangqi in Inner Mongolia, and the Chang'e-6 mission of the lunar exploration project was a complete success. This time, Chang'e-6 carried 1935.3 grams of soil on the far side of the moon, which is the only lunar soil on the far side of the moon in the world, and China's aerospace has once again made an important contribution to human spaceflight.
Soon after Chang'e-6 returned, a rumor appeared on the Internet that France found that the similarity was only 25% after comparing the lunar soil of China and the United States, and only the single-digit elements were similar.
"Either the United States has adulterated the lunar soil of other countries, or the lunar soil itself is fake."
"Not quite like the same moon."
"China's lunar soil has water and glassy particles, while the U.S. doesn't."
In particular, the domestic self-media once again publicized these contents as evidence of the US moon landing fraud, which caused a great negative impact.
The lunar soil mentioned here was excavated by Chang'e-5 on the front side of the moon that year, and 1.5 grams were given to France in April 23. The so-called comparative data was not obtained by the French side, and in fact, the French side did not make relevant comparisons at all. This data first appeared in 2022, and some popular science bloggers cited professional papers and wrote an article "Why are the lunar soils in China and the United States completely different?" ”
However, neither the popular science blogger nor the professional paper questioned the falsification of the U.S. lunar samples, and the comparison of the papers has a very detailed academic basis.
In other words, this was originally a rigorous academic paper, which was cited by professional bloggers as popular science, but it was deliberately interpreted by the self-media, pinching off the head and removing the tail, stealing the beams and changing the pillars, and concocting ironclad evidence of the fraud of the US moon landing.
At present, there is no evidence to prove that the US moon landing was fake, but this topic is very popular among Chinese netizens, and many people are convinced. In the comment section of all related news, there is always a large group of people who question the US moon landing and come up with such and such so-called evidence, even if someone refutes them, it cannot change their minds.
There is a huge group that doubts the US landing on the moon, and there is another huge group on the Internet, that is, the group that unconditionally supports Jiang Ping.
Jiang Ping is a secondary school student, participated in the Ali Shu Competition, got the 12th place in the preliminaries, and was praised by netizens as a genius girl, Hua Luogeng was reincarnated. However, too much information was exposed later, all pointing to one thing, that is, there is a possibility that her grades are fraudulent, and this possibility is very high.
At present, no one can prove that she is fraudulent, but there is too much evidence against her at present: there are many errors and omissions in the board book, professional materials are wrong, the 150-point test paper is 83 points, I usually don't use computers, and the computers used for the exam are borrowed, etc., which makes people have to wonder.
There has always been a voice on the Internet, that is, Jiang Ping should come forward to clarify the public's doubts, she doesn't need to do anything, she just needs to open a live broadcast, do the questions of the preliminary round again, answer a few related questions, everyone has their own conclusions, but Jiang Ping has never come forward.
Everyone knows in their hearts that in today's society, the master is a false proposition among the people, and the arrival of miracles is even more unrealistic. Especially in a subject like mathematics, there can be geniuses, but there will be no miracles, the development of geniuses definitely has a trajectory to follow, like Jiang Ping, who was unknown for the first 17 years, had no shining points, and suddenly appeared to become the 12th in the world, which is doubtful in itself.
The suspicion is based on known irrationality, and it is not necessarily believed that Jiang Ping is cheating.
But there is a group of people on the Internet who are convinced, they just think that Jiang Ping is a genius, and the doubts about Jiang Ping are the suppression of Jiang Ping by the interest groups of major universities, which is to bully honest people.
Once again, they put aside the facts and plunged headlong into conspiracy theories.
It's the same as skeptical of the U.S. moon landing. It is not that the United States has landed on the moon is necessarily true, but the currently known conditions do point to the successful manned landing of the United States on the moon. And those who doubt it can't come up with solid evidence, and are always tossing and turning in conspiracy theories.
There is tangible evidence of the US moon landing, and they blindly question it.
There are too many suspicious points in the Jiang Ping incident, but they have no brains to trust.
In both cases, in essence, there is no embodiment of the scientific spirit, there is no scientific skepticism, and it is more of an emotional expression.
Therefore, those who question the American moon landing and those who believe in Jiang Ping's miracle overlap to a large extent.
#头条创作挑战赛##数学天才姜萍为何会受到质疑#