"And the mud" leads to "bad money drives out good money"
For a long time, I often see "and mud" comments such as "Wen Wu First" and "Wu Wu No. 2" in the comment area of articles on the platform. I always insist that as long as there are enough arguments as a premise, and there is indeed a visible gap in strength, then there should be no ambiguity to leave room for development for the weak side, otherwise, it will inevitably cause the social phenomenon of "bad money drives out good money"!
The views of "Wen Wu First" and "Wu Wu Wu" and the mud directly give a lot of garbage culture room to survive.
In the current society, the number of fans and live broadcast rooms of self-media people with very low cultural quality is even far more than that of their counterparts with high cultural quality, which not only shows that there are too many uneducated people, but also shows that most people are not ashamed of "no culture", but feel that the pursuit of garbage culture is personal freedom, and even use "no first" and muddy words to create rationality for the garbage culture they advocate!
In Daolang's "The First Snow in 2002" album, the lyrics are extremely explicit, focusing on the sinking market with a low lower limit of moral culture. It is precisely because it was not criticized a lot back then, and similar or even more obscene songs abound in the Chinese music scene after that, which has led to the flood of garbage songs in today's Chinese music scene and are accepted by the market.
What's even more ridiculous is that the people who support Daolang take the so-called "evidence" that is not in existence to cyberbully innocent people every day, ignoring even the basic facts. I wonder if someone who is admired by a bunch of trash who bullies others online can be a moral role model? Obviously, it's all the way, after all, the same kind attracts! Otherwise, why would someone have been watching the drama and using the traffic of cyberbullying to make a fortune!
Therefore, in the current society, the prevalence of all kinds of garbage culture, those so-called neutrals who initially "made peace with the mud" are precisely the biggest groups that contribute to the flames, and they are responsible for the degradation of the culture of the times!
In the previous article, although the harm of "and thin mud" was mentioned, it is still necessary to delve into whether it is reasonable to "have no first text" and "no second martial arts".
Wu Wu is the second
The reason why "Wu Wu No. 2" is mentioned first is because in terms of rationality, "Wu Wu No. 2" and "Wen Wu No. 1" are not the same thing, and they must be looked at separately.
Usually, words like "Wu Wu Wu" often appear in the comparison of the strength of the armed forces of historical figures.
Through logical and rational thinking, "Zhang Fei killed Yue Fei and killed all over the sky." "It's an inevitable result! Because there is no specific and fair comparison index for the comparison of the strength of force unless there has been a face-to-face single challenge, so it is indeed impossible to compare just looking at the difficult and quantifiable combat indicators of historical figures such as Zhang Fei and Yue Fei.
Of course, even if it is a historical figure in different periods, Su Shi of the Northern Song Dynasty, as a literati, must not be able to defeat the Southern Song Dynasty Xin Qiji, who cultivated both civil and military, and the gap is so large that you can ignore the secondary factor of "whether you really singled out".
There is no first
The situation of "no first" is obviously different.
First, there are differences in literary styles, differences in the difficulty of creation, and differences in literary status. There is a big gap between the status of poets and lyricists of the same level in their respective fields in the history of literature, and the reason is very simple: words are poetry, and the literary status and difficulty of creation of poems are different. Therefore, there is an obvious gap between the literary and historical status of Du Fu and Xin Qiji.
Second, Chinese characters, as the carrier of all literature, have not changed significantly for thousands of years, that is to say, when comparing the level of literature, the core element of Chinese characters is almost constant, which provides an absolute standard for cross-era comparison.
Based on the above reasons, when making specific comparisons, the "harmony and mud" discourse of "Wen Wu First" is only applicable to the comparison between a very small number of characters and works that are difficult to distinguish, and when the gap is obvious, this set of "harmony and mud" will blur the gap, and then blur the evaluation criteria, until the strength and weakness are reversed, and eventually lead to "bad money drives out good money".
For example: Su Shi and Li Bai are more than poetry, but anyone who understands poetry appreciation should know that the gap between Su Shi's poetry and Li Bai is too big, even if you count the words "poetry", Su Shi's poetry is also significantly different from Li Bai. If this comparison is not direct enough, a more direct comparison of works can be made, Su Shi's poems are placed in Li Bai's works, and basically there is no top grade like "Will Enter the Wine", and the gap is clear at a glance.
If we think that the poetry level of Su Shi and Li Bai is comparable, then we must agree that Song poetry is highly equal to or even surpass Tang poetry, and we must respect and learn the reasoning of "text as poetry", and the best poetry tradition of the Chinese will inevitably face a comprehensive decline, and the boring, dry, and forcibly reasoned garbage Song poetry will gradually expel the better Tang poetry that blends with scenes and expresses aspirations, and the goal of subverting the excellent tradition of Chinese poetry has been achieved!
Therefore, "Wen Wu No. 1" is not valid in most cases, it is just a lot of wall grass "and mud" words! The prevalence of such rhetoric is to confuse the standards of good and bad, and ultimately clear the way for the promotion of garbage culture. Isn't China's excellent traditional culture subverted little by little!