Hello dear readers, I am your millennium. Every day I will share some interesting stories, after reading the words that I think are interesting, please take the trouble to pay attention and like! Because it's really important to me!! Thank you all, let's pass on the story and share the joy
#长文创作激励计划#在历史的长河中, the question of when China began to fall behind the rest of the world is like tracing a lost clue in the fog of time, full of complexity and profundity.
Let's first look at the Qin and Han dynasties. It was an era of turmoil and heroes.
Qin Shi Huang unified the six kingdoms and established a centralized feudal system, with the same track and the same text, showing a strong ruling power. The Great Wall stretches out among the lofty mountains, like a giant dragon guarding the land of China.
In agriculture, the widespread use of iron farming tools and the spread of ox farming techniques have greatly increased productivity.
However, in the Western world at this time, the ancient Greek civilization was shining brightly. The democracy of Athens provided a platform for citizens to participate in politics, and fields such as philosophy, science, and art flourished. Aristotle was contemplating the mysteries of the universe, and Socrates was discussing the truth with people.
Despite the political, economic, and cultural achievements of China during the Qin and Han dynasties, there were already signs of disparity in some respects compared to the West at the same time.
For example, in the field of science and technology, ancient Greece already had a more systematic theoretical system of mathematics, physics and other disciplines, while Chinese science focused more on the accumulation of practical technology.
Then turn the hand of time to the Ming and Qing dynasties. At the beginning of the Ming Dynasty, Zheng He led a huge fleet of ships on a long voyage, demonstrating China's strong seafaring strength and advanced shipbuilding technology at that time.
But with the passage of time, the Ming Dynasty began to implement a policy of maritime ban, which restricted foreign exchanges.
During the Qing Dynasty, the rulers pursued a policy of seclusion and seclusion, immersed in the dream of the Celestial Empire.
On the other side of the ocean, Europe experienced the Renaissance movement, people's minds were greatly emancipated, and science and technology developed rapidly. Copernicus challenged geocentrism and established heliocentrism; Galileo used a telescope to observe the starry sky, opening the door to modern astronomy.
The wave of the Industrial Revolution arose in Britain, machine production replaced manual labor, and productivity was increased like never before.
At the same time, China's economy is still dominated by subsistence small-scale farmers, and the development of handicrafts is slow.
In terms of political system, the feudal autocracy of the Ming and Qing dynasties reached its peak, with a high degree of centralization of imperial power, a rigid bureaucratic system, and a lack of motivation for innovation and change.
From a cultural point of view, the imperial examination system in the Ming and Qing dynasties gradually became ossified, and the eight-strand scholars constrained people's thoughts, and academic innovation was restricted.
The Renaissance and Enlightenment in Europe, on the other hand, advocated the ideas of freedom, equality, and democracy, laying the ideological foundation for social change.
When we think deeply about these two periods, we will find that China's backwardness was not achieved overnight, but was the result of the interweaving of various factors and the accumulation of a long time.
During the Qin and Han dynasties, although China established a strong centralized system, this system limited local autonomy and innovation vitality to a certain extent.
At the same time, Confucianism gradually became the mainstream, and its emphasis on hierarchical concepts and religious norms constrained people's thinking to a certain extent.
During the Ming and Qing dynasties, the strengthening of feudal rule and the closure of foreign policy made China miss the opportunity to communicate and learn from the world.
For example, while Western science, technology, ideology, and culture are changing with each passing day, Chinese intellectuals are still searching for chapters and sentences in the pile of old papers, and are ignorant of the changes in the outside world.
In addition, the homogeneity of the economic structure and the restriction of business development are also important reasons for China's backwardness.
In China, agriculture has always been dominant, and commerce and handicrafts have been suppressed. In Europe, the boom in commerce led to the rise of cities and the development of capitalism.
When we dig deeper into this issue, we can uncover more underlying factors.
From the perspective of the education system, traditional Chinese education focuses on the memorization of classics and the cultivation of test-taking ability, and lacks the importance of practical and innovative ability.
In contrast, the European education system pays more attention to cultivating students' observation, experimentation and reasoning skills, providing talent support for the development of science and technology.
From the perspective of the mobility of social classes, China's feudal hierarchy is strict, social classes are solidified, and it is difficult for the people at the bottom to change their fate through their own efforts.
And in Europe, with the development of capitalism, the mobility of social classes increased, providing the impetus for social progress.
From a geopolitical point of view, China is located in East Asia, and its relatively closed geographical environment has affected its communication with the outside world to a certain extent.
The proximity and fierce competition among European countries has promoted the spread and exchange of technology and ideas.
To sum up, the time when China began to lag behind the world can hardly be simply attributed to the Qin and Han dynasties or the Ming and Qing dynasties.
It is a long and complex process that involves many factors such as politics, economy, culture, education, etc.
As we continue to think deeply about this issue, we can further expand our understanding from the following new perspectives.
From the perspective of the path of scientific and technological development, the development of science and technology in ancient China mainly relied on the accumulation of experience and the inheritance of craftsmen, and lacked systematic scientific and theoretical support.
In modern times, Europe gradually established a scientific system based on experiments and mathematics, which promoted the rapid development of science and technology.
From the perspective of the transformation of the economic model, Europe has realized the transformation from an agrarian society to an industrial society after the industrial revolution, while the transformation of China's economic model is relatively slow.
From the perspective of ideological changes, the Renaissance, Reformation, and Enlightenment in Europe made profound criticisms of traditional religious and feudal concepts, and laid the ideological foundation for the modernization process.
However, China's traditional culture is relatively unadaptable and innovative in the face of the changes of the times.
In short, to explore when China began to lag behind the world, we need to analyze the development of history from a more comprehensive, objective and in-depth perspective.
Through the study of this issue, we can draw lessons from history and provide useful reference for China's development today.
When we analyze this phenomenon in more depth, we can also explore it more comprehensively from the following aspects.
From the perspective of the development of military technology, in modern times, European military technology has undergone revolutionary changes, such as the improvement of artillery, the invention of firearms, and the innovation of tactics.
However, China's military technology development in the Ming and Qing dynasties lagged behind, and it was powerless in the face of external aggression.
From the point of view of the construction of the legal system, Europe has gradually established a relatively complete legal system, which has guaranteed the rights of citizens and the operation of the market economy.
However, China's feudal legal system was mainly for the maintenance of imperial power and ruling order, and the protection of individual rights was relatively insufficient.
From the perspective of international trade and finance, Europe has actively carried out international trade in modern times, established a modern financial system, and promoted the accumulation of capital and economic expansion.
China's policy of seclusion during the Ming and Qing dynasties restricted the development of international trade, and the financial system was relatively backward.
From the perspective of population flow and urbanization process, the industrial revolution in Europe has led to a large-scale flow of population from rural areas to cities, accelerating the urbanization process.
During the Ming and Qing dynasties, China's population movement was restricted and urbanization was slow.
To sum up, China's lag behind the world is a historical phenomenon that is intertwined with multiple factors, which requires us to conduct in-depth research and thinking from multiple dimensions.
Only in this way can we better understand the law of historical development and provide valuable experience and enlightenment for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
As we dig deeper into the historical mystery of China's backwardness to the rest of the world, we can gain new insights into more areas that have not been explored.
From the perspective of the organization and funding model of scientific research, Europe has gradually formed a diversified pattern of scientific research supported by the government, universities and private institutions in modern times. For example, the establishment of the Royal Society provides a platform for scientists to exchange and collaborate, while the government and wealthy businessmen are willing to provide financial support for promising scientific research projects.
In China, scientific research often relies on the spontaneous exploration of individual scholars, and lacks systematic organization and sufficient financial guarantees. Even in the Ming and Qing dynasties, official investment in scientific research was relatively limited, and it was difficult to form a large-scale and sustainable scientific research force.
From the perspective of intellectual property protection, Europe has gradually established a relatively complete intellectual property system after the industrial revolution, encouraging innovators to protect their inventions and creations through patents, copyrights and other means, thus stimulating more enthusiasm for innovation.
However, in China, the concept of intellectual property rights in traditional society is relatively vague, and the inheritance of many technologies and crafts mainly relies on oral transmission between master and apprentice, and innovation results are easy to be imitated and disseminated by others without compensation, which inhibits the enthusiasm for innovation to a certain extent.
From the perspective of unbalanced regional development, although there are regional development differences in Europe in modern times, through the development of trade and transportation, exchanges and cooperation between different regions are more frequent, which promotes the dissemination of technology and knowledge, and reduces the constraints of regional disparities on overall development.
On the other hand, in China, during the Ming and Qing dynasties, the economic center of gravity was mainly concentrated in a few areas such as Jiangnan, and the development of the vast inland and border areas was relatively lagging behind, and the exchanges and coordinated development between regions were subject to many restrictions, which affected the overall development speed and innovation ability of the country.
As we continue to dig deeper into this topic, here are a few key factors.
From the perspective of population quality and education popularization, after the industrial revolution, with the advancement of education reform, the literacy rate in Europe has increased significantly, and the general population also has the opportunity to receive basic education, which has cultivated a large number of labor force with certain knowledge and skills for industrial production and technological innovation.
In contrast, during the Ming and Qing dynasties, China's educational resources were mainly concentrated in the cities and the wealthy class, and the education popularization in the vast rural areas was low, and the quality of the population improved slowly, making it difficult to meet the demand for talents for social development.
Thinking from the level of industrial standardization and quality control, Europe has gradually established strict industrial standards and quality control systems in the process of industrialization to ensure the consistency and reliability of products and improve the competitiveness of industrial products.
However, in traditional handicraft production in China, standards and quality control often rely on the personal experience and skills of craftsmen, and the lack of unified norms and effective supervision makes it difficult to achieve large-scale and high-quality production.
From the perspective of the ability and strategy to deal with natural disasters, Europe has made remarkable progress in flood control, irrigation and earthquake resistance through scientific research and technological innovation in modern times, and has improved its ability to resist and respond to natural disasters.
During the Ming and Qing dynasties, although China had accumulated some experience in water conservancy projects, it was often unable to cope with large-scale natural disasters, which brought great damage and hindrance to social and economic development.
To sum up, China's lag behind the world is the result of the intertwined and long-term action of many factors.
As we continue to delve deeper into this phenomenon, we can further expand our understanding from the following new perspectives.
From the perspective of medical care and public health system, Europe has experienced a medical revolution in modern times, established a modern medical and health system and public health system, effectively controlled the spread of infectious diseases, and improved the health level and life expectancy of the population.
In contrast, during the Ming and Qing dynasties, although traditional medicine developed to a certain extent, awareness and measures in the field of public health were relatively weak, and outbreaks of large-scale infectious diseases often brought heavy blows to society.
Thinking from the perspective of military strategy and weaponry, Europe has undergone many military changes in modern times, from tactics to weaponry, such as the improvement of artillery, the popularization of rifles, and the innovation of military strategy.
During the Ming and Qing dynasties, China lagged behind in the development of military technology and strategy, and gradually fell at a disadvantage in the face of external military threats.
From the perspective of the financial system and capital market, Europe has formed a relatively mature financial system and capital market in modern times, providing financing channels and risk-sharing mechanisms for the development of enterprises.
However, during the Ming and Qing dynasties, China's financial system was still dominated by traditional money banks and ticket numbers, which could hardly meet the capital needs of large-scale industrialization and modernization.
In conclusion, the study of when China began to lag behind the world is a never-ending process of exploration.
When we analyze this phenomenon in more depth, we can also explore it more comprehensively from the following aspects.
From the perspective of social welfare and security system, with the development of industry and social progress in modern times, Europe has gradually established a social welfare and security system including pension, medical care, unemployment relief, etc., which has alleviated social contradictions and promoted social stability and development to a certain extent.
In China during the Ming and Qing dynasties, social welfare mainly relied on family and non-governmental mutual assistance, which lacked systematization and universality, and it was difficult to cope with the impact of social changes.
From the perspective of cultural exchange and integration, Europe has actively absorbed the essence of culture from all over the world in modern times, integrated with its own culture, and promoted cultural innovation and development.
However, during the Ming and Qing dynasties, China's foreign cultural exchanges were relatively limited, and the ability of cultural self-renewal and innovation was insufficient.
From the perspective of energy utilization and industrial power, Europe took the lead in the large-scale use of coal, oil and other energy sources in the industrial revolution, and invented power devices such as steam engines, realizing the transformation from traditional manual labor to large-scale machine production.
However, during the Ming and Qing dynasties, China's energy utilization was still dominated by traditional biomass energy, and industrial power mainly relied on human and animal power, and failed to achieve a fundamental breakthrough.
To sum up, the reasons why China lags behind the world are multifaceted and complex, involving changes and development in various fields such as society, economy, science and technology, and culture.
Through in-depth study of this historical phenomenon, we can more clearly understand our own strengths and weaknesses, provide valuable experience and inspiration for future development, and help the Chinese nation achieve great rejuvenation and regain its standing among the world's great powers.