On June 29, a screenshot of the two units in Dejiang County arranging a vigil for the families of faculty and staff was disseminated on the Internet, which was hotly discussed by netizens. The Propaganda Department of the county party committee and relevant personnel further responded that the father of a teacher in the department died, and the school and hospital formulated a wake-up plan according to the usual practice, reflecting humanistic care, and there was no collective condolence after investigation by the Commission for Discipline Inspection, which did not affect the order of work and study. This has triggered people to think about whether only the disadvantaged groups are suitable for scheduling.
Loading...
According to the facts, the deceased was the father of a secondary school teacher, and his wife worked in a local hospital. Here are two units out of care for the faculty and staff, the arrangement has been formulated. This practice itself has a good purpose and a relatively civilized form, and it is not mandatory for all personnel to attend. Behind the heated discussion among netizens, there may be doubts about "whether high-ranking officials and nobles don't need to be like this".
But in fact, everyone needs the mourning and companionship of family and friends at the end of their lives, and class status should not be the criterion of whether or not such a need is necessary. Rather, we should re-examine the bonds of affection between people, rather than exaggerating identity differences. From this point of view, the official response is relatively smooth and reasonable.
The so-called "disadvantaged groups" should not be limited to the attributes of certain groups of people themselves, but should also take into account the integrity of their social support networks. Living in cities, with the acceleration of social mobility, many people have weakened their networks of family and friends. In the event of a major holiday or funeral, it is difficult for individuals to find additional help if the employer does not provide appropriate care.
As a category, the family members of employees often establish a certain degree of dependence, even outside their workplace. Therefore, from this point of view, it is understandable to design a more intimate support mechanism for such people. Of course, the operation of the mechanism should also be voluntary, so as not to become a mandatory interference.
We cannot ignore the social costs behind the urbanization process, such as the difficulty of some groups to receive effective support in the process. This brings complementary responsibilities to the public service. Although the form of the unit to provide assistance such as scheduling seems to be disadvantaged, its essence is to give social care. This is in line with the concept of public welfare.
As long as the practice is reasonable, the goal is good, and the work order is not affected, such an arrangement is not unavoidable. We should seek to understand the problem from different perspectives, rather than judging it too one-sidedly by the word "vulnerable".
In conclusion, the arguments of the official response are more reasonable in the case of this incident. But when we understand the concept of "vulnerable", we also need to look at the multifaceted factors of the problem and focus on how to provide more human support. The care provided by the unit reflects the goodwill to the subordinates and deserves our understanding and support.
Only by examining one thing with a broader vision and an open mind can we give a more comprehensive and neutral conclusion. A fair and rational conclusion needs to analyze all angles of the problem, link it with actual cases, and take into account theoretical support. There is no problem in the purpose and operation mechanism of the "shift and vigil" arrangement in the current matter, which reflects the unit's humanistic care for its subordinates.
However, we should not overemphasize the "weak attributes" of a certain group, which may lead to a certain stereotype or misleading. What really matters is to look at the problem from a broader perspective, to pay attention to the various factors and to give understanding. The times are advancing, the social support network is changing, and public services need to be supplemented and improved. With openness and empathy, we can come to a much more unbiased and comprehensive conclusion.
Finally, this case reminds us of the importance of building closer bonds of affection between people. Birth, old age, sickness and death, regardless of rank and class, are all human nature. We are all in need of support and companionship, and we should all be committed to providing it. Only on this basis can society truly realize the warmth of community. I believe that by working together, we will build a more empathetic social environment.
Welcome to comment in the comment area!