It's really strange, it turns out that there will be joint and several liability at all times, is this a bad habit? In some cases, it seems that as soon as someone is injured, there is a risk that the surrounding people or a certain place will be caught up in the situation and take unnecessary responsibility
This kind of behavior is wrong and inauthentic, and it seriously damages the social atmosphere, which may cause everyone to be more cautious, for fear that they will be "involved" if they are not careful
Recently, in a supermarket in Fujian, a video of a father making trouble rushed to the hot search, and many netizens angrily denounced: According to you, I estimate that you can become a millionaire
Loading...
The father said: My own doll was injured in the supermarket
In the face of such a situation, any parent is very angry and wants to say that the supermarket is responsible, which is understandable, and it is observed that the child does not have any problems on the surface, so why does this parent become emotional?
The source of this text, the text of the video publisher, may be an eyewitness, or it may be an employee of the supermarket, of course, this short article is only a one-sided statement, and everyone needs to interpret it carefully
If this is the case, then the father seems to be a little unkind, the parents do not play the guardianship responsibility, and they are not in place, so why bother the supermarket? Someone else has to pay for everything?
Strongly condemn the "back-to-the-back" mechanism
And there is no problem with the way it is handled as a business, there is no evasion of responsibility, but this father is a little bit inched, and it is a bit too much to ask for more money under the pretext of sequelae
Did you really not think about your own responsibilities at all? If the sequelae come out after 2 days, you still have to give 50,000, is there a bottom? And there are no sequelae for 5000 children?
You must know that joint and several liability is not used by you without a bottom line, this father has seriously undermined fairness, and it is recommended that the merchant still follow the formal procedure!
If a precedent is set, it is estimated that there will be trouble in the future, this father hopes that you are emotionally out of control and acts, and afterwards still hopes that you can apologize to the supermarket and apologize to the public
Although it was not photographed, it had to be ruled out that it was the father's responsibility, and I also hoped that the supermarket would strengthen patrols, or post notices, or put an end to the behavior of rubbing the air conditioner
Many netizens said: This father has blackmail
Well, I don't know how to deal with the follow-up things for the time being, and I don't have too much suspicion here, I believe the official will give a satisfactory answer
Don't be like this, society doesn't allow such a culture to exist, there are still very few people like this father, maybe he just lacks some cognition!
Yes, after all, it was caused by oneself, and others can't be blamed, this is the conventional thinking, if it is done by others, then there is no problem in finding trouble
It is estimated that the supermarket will arrange a separate room for each person resting, provide food and accommodation, and there are no water and electricity bills [cover your face], and provide blankets when it is cold
This is your mistake, you go to eat right, then you should ask the store to cook the food but make it hot, so the store has a problem [laughing and crying]
The above content is for reference only, do not be more true, reasonable interpretation, true and false self-identification