laitimes

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

author:Rose Tea Party

For your better reading and interactive experience, in order for you to see more content in time, click "Follow", we will update you with wonderful information every day!

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

Edit: Rose Tea Party

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

The second Gulf War in 2003 was a war unilaterally launched by the United States in defiance of the opposition of the international community.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

Prior to this, in the first Gulf War in 1991, the United States sent troops under the authorization of the United Nations Security Council to rescue Kuwait, which had been invaded by Iraq.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

Since then, the world has recognized the incomparable superiority of the US military, and the Soviet Union has subsequently disintegrated itself. However, just 12 years later, President Bush bypassed the United Nations and invaded Iraq again on the grounds that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, overthrowing the Saddam regime.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

This illegal war is actually because Iraq is trying to get rid of the dollar oil pricing system. France, China, Russia, the European Union and the League of Arab States all oppose the United States' actions, but they are powerless to stop the lion-like United States. In this way, Saddam's regime was collapsed, and weapons of mass destruction were not found. The illegality of the second Gulf War has once again made the whole world see clearly the true face of US unipolar hegemony.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

From the first Gulf War when the United States established its hegemonic position in the world to the second Gulf War when its dictatorial nature was completely exposed, this power should have been restrained a long time ago. The Syrian civil war that broke out in 2011 was another attempt by the United States to overthrow the Assad regime.

The second Gulf War in 2003 was a war unilaterally launched by the United States in defiance of the opposition of the international community. Prior to this, in the first Gulf War in 1991, the United States sent troops under the authorization of the United Nations Security Council to rescue Kuwait, which had been invaded by Iraq.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

Since then, the world has recognized the incomparable superiority of the US military, and the Soviet Union has subsequently disintegrated itself. However, just 12 years later, President Bush bypassed the United Nations and invaded Iraq again on the grounds that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, overthrowing the Saddam regime.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

This illegal war is actually because Iraq is trying to get rid of the dollar oil pricing system. France, China, Russia, the European Union and the League of Arab States all oppose the United States' actions, but they are powerless to stop the lion-like United States.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

In this way, Saddam's regime was collapsed, and weapons of mass destruction were not found. The illegality of the second Gulf War has once again made the whole world see clearly the true face of US unipolar hegemony.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

From the first Gulf War when the United States established its hegemonic position in the world to the second Gulf War when its dictatorial nature was completely exposed, this power should have been restrained a long time ago.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

The Syrian civil war that broke out in 2011 was another attempt by the United States to overthrow the Assad regime. The difference is that this time Russia, Iran and Allah entered the war to support the Syrian side, forming a confrontation with NATO. It was a miniature version of a world war, in which the United States suffered a defeat in Syria and began the process of collapse of its unipolar hegemony.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

Since the early 90s of the last century, the United States has established itself as the world's sole superpower with the help of the first Gulf War. At that time, the U.S. military's outstanding high-precision weapons showed unparalleled combat power, quickly crushing the Iraqi army, and convincing all countries in the world, including the Soviet Union at that time.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

After that, the collapse of the Soviet Union swept away the last competitor of the United States and ushered in a golden age of its unipolar rule.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

The second Gulf War was a turning point that exposed the authoritarian nature of the United States, which wantonly violated international legitimacy in order to safeguard its own interests. This has seriously undermined the credibility of American leadership.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

Power often breeds arrogance. The United States did not stop there, but unilaterally launched the second Iraq war again in 2003. This war not only violated international legitimacy, but also exposed the essence of US hegemonism. At that time, the United Nations, the European Union, Arab countries, etc. were all resolutely opposed, but in the end they could not stop the arrogance of the United States. Weapons of mass destruction were also not discovered after the war, as the US side claimed, further exposing the fig leaf of war lies.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

Since then, the world has begun to examine the hegemony of the United States, and the legitimacy of the unipolar rule of the United States has also been questioned. The outbreak of the Syrian civil war in 2011 became the fuse that shook the hegemony of the United States.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

The United States tried to overthrow the Assad regime, but met with tough resistance from Russia, Iran and other countries. The exchange of fire between the two sides on the ground in Syria is actually a miniature version of the world war, marking the beginning of a new round of great power competition.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

Ultimately, the loss of the United States in Syria sounded the death knell for its unipolar era. The subsequent defeat of the United States in Afghanistan, its passivity in Ukraine, and China's tough response in the Asia-Pacific region all heralded the end of the unipolar era. The international landscape is shifting to multipolarity, and the United States is being forced to learn to share power and interests with other countries. Is this the existing destiny of the hegemon?

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

The power of the country will eventually be impacted by the torrent of the times. Although the United States is still an important force, it is no longer possible to sweep through thousands of armies and dominate the world as it once did.

If you understand Saddam's death, you can understand why you say: Bashar broke the US hegemony in one fell swoop

Power balance and benefit-sharing will be a more pragmatic path in the future. What else do you think about this?

(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any doubt about the incident, it will be deleted or changed immediately after contact.

Read on