laitimes

The Security Council repeated the old tune, the United States set a trap, and China was not used to it, so it responded three times to announce change

author:Liu Zhenqi's view
The Security Council repeated the old tune, the United States set a trap, and China was not used to it, so it responded three times to announce change

According to relevant media reports, at the recent Security Council, the United States attacked China on the so-called Korean Peninsula issue, and what it said was something old-fashioned. However, this move by the United States is nothing more than a rehash of the same old tune, trying to smear China's image, tie China and the Korean Peninsula issue together, and prepare to use this to contain China's development.

With such a shallow trap, the mainland will definitely not drill into it. However, this time is different from the previous ones, not only did we not fall into the trap set by the United States and the West, but we even used three counterattacks to tell the United States and the West that the situation has changed. Judging from the leaked videos, Ambassador Geng Shuang of the mainland made it very clear this time that the current tension on the peninsula is caused by what the United States should reflect on. Not only that, but when the United States is reflecting, it is better to think about what it has done, and not think about how to throw the pot on China's head all day long. China's attitude on the Korean Peninsula issue, and even its efforts, do not need the United States to tell us what China should do.

The Security Council repeated the old tune, the United States set a trap, and China was not used to it, so it responded three times to announce change

Obviously, Ambassador Geng Shuang's remarks almost pointed at the nose of the United States and told it not to point fingers at China. However, I don't know if you have noticed that the mainland's attitude on international affairs has become quite clear and firm.

Taking the three retaliations this time as an example, at the beginning, the mainland was willing to save some face for the United States, referring to the United States as "individual countries." This is normal, after all, what the mainland has always believed in is to be a man and leave a line, so that we can meet each other in the future.

The Security Council repeated the old tune, the United States set a trap, and China was not used to it, so it responded three times to announce change

But it is clear that the United States regards our move to save face as a concession. The rhetoric of the representative of the United States has also become more and more excessive. In this case, we need not be polite, and what we can find is that when the mainland explicitly named the United States, the expression of the American representative was quite flustered.

Going back more than ten years, such a scene is actually very difficult to appear. On the one hand, China has become strong and has been able to have a sufficient say in international affairs. On the other hand, that's what we say rotten, the United States is in decline.

International affairs are very realistic, who has the big fist, who speaks strongly. Now we have changed the previous style of "being a man and leaving a line", not only because the United States has gone too far in spreading rumors and smearing, but more importantly, China is now gradually taking action to grasp the international discourse and public opinion.

For a long time, the United States and the West have relied on their own hands to hold the power of international discourse and public opinion, and have regarded the Security Council as their own hall. Smearing and rumor-mongering are light, and a tube of laundry detergent can actually become an excuse for the United States to use force against other countries.

Now that we are being chased by the Houthis all over the Red Sea, the United States still has to stubbornly miss the aircraft carrier, we will not make a move, when will we shoot?

The Security Council repeated the old tune, the United States set a trap, and China was not used to it, so it responded three times to announce change

To put it bluntly, Ambassador Geng Shuang's three responses are not only a response to this question, but also a clear message to the United States and the West. The days of the Security Council's "one-word speech" have passed.

China will not allow the United States and the West to continue to point fingers, nor will it give the United States and the West any more opportunities to spread rumors and smear them. The ambassador's three responses are just the beginning, and what China should do next depends on whether the United States and the West listen to China's words in their hearts. But in any case, China has a way, and now it is different from the past, and the United States and the West, especially the United States, had better weigh it clearly, and it can withstand a few Chinese counterattacks. The response announced a change, China is not used to the United States, and the ambassador made it very clear, don't point fingers.

Read on