Hello everyone!
Speaking of hybrids, it is impossible to avoid the Japanese Toyota Honda, their THS or i-MMD systems have long been famous, and models equipped with these two systems are generally very fuel-efficient, which makes them popular with many consumers.
Not long ago, Beijing Hyundai launched the Tucson L Hybrid, and its structure is also a different path, and at first glance it does not change much from gasoline cars. So, is it powered enough? Save or not save fuel? How quiet is it? In terms of user experience, what is the difference between the honda CR-V hybrid, which is the industry benchmark? After watching this episode, you will know!
Hurry up and poke the video below!
↓↓↓
Video loading...
Dynamic performance
The acceleration ability is good
Although everyone must have bought a hybrid car for fuel saving, I think power is still very important. Motivation is something I can usually not use, but you can't do without when I need it.
As is customary, let's start with a straight-line acceleration race! Who do you think will win?
We measured that the zero-hundred-hundred-paced performance of these two cars was in the early 8 seconds, which was very close. But in the direct comparison PK, we found some differences. The Tucson L hybrid was very strong in the first half and flattened in the middle and back. The CR-V hybrid lagged behind more in the first half and only caught up in the middle and back sections.
This result is caused by the different structures of their hybrid systems. For example, the hybrid architecture of the Tucson L hybrid is as follows:
It has a 2.0L self-priming engine, and there is a start-up power generation integrated machine on the engine belt, which is mainly responsible for inspiration electricity and kinetic energy recovery, and is not responsible for driving, just like the motors of many light hybrid vehicles. It also has a drive motor, placed between the engine and the 6AT transmission.
At the beginning, the drive motor starts first, and at the same time, in the floor oil state, the engine and the motor drive the wheels at the same time, and the comprehensive torque of 350N·m erupts together, which will be very fierce.
The hybrid architecture of cr-V hybrid is like this:
The same 2.0L self-priming engine, a generator and a drive motor. At the beginning, it is also driven by the motor, and at the same time, the floor oil state, the engine also starts, but it does not participate in the drive, but fully generates power to the generator, and only the motor drives the wheel, and the maximum torque is 315N·m.
The combined motor + engine torque of the Tucson L Hybrid is 350N·m, which is stronger than the CR-V, so it leads in the first half. In the second half of the journey, it is the power that relies on it, and the more powerful CR-V hybrid catches up.
But I have to say ah, these two 2.0L self-priming hybrid SUVs can achieve 8 seconds of zero hundred acceleration, has not lost the same level of turbocharged models.
There is a difference in the power experience
In addition to the acceleration performance, the difference in the power experience between the two cars is more obvious. The Tucson L Hybrid has a more fuel-driven experience, with a 6AT gearbox and ASC active shift control technology for fast and responsive gear changes.
When you step on the accelerator deeply, you can feel the sense of stairs on the gas truck, and the process of engine sound from low to high pitch. Sensoryly, Tucson L hybrids give you more stimulation.
The CR-V hybrid does not have a gearbox in the traditional sense and drives more like a tram. At low speeds, only the motor starts, the ride is very good but there is no sound, and there is a lack of fun for people who like oil cars.
After the engine intervenes, the speed of the Honda engine is often only maintained in one speed range, the noise is somewhat obvious, and it does not sound as pleasant as the Tucson L hybrid.
Sound insulation performance
Speaking of engine sound, we thought that we should make a comparison between the sound insulation quietness of the two cars. We tested their internal noise levels at stationary, start-up, engine idle, 0-60km/h acceleration, and uniform cruising at different speeds.
The actual test proves that the two cars have their own wins and losses in different test items, but overall I think they are in the same grade. After the engine intervenes, their interior will become significantly noisy, but it is still within the acceptable range, which is in line with our expectations for this price point model.
Fuel consumption test
Here comes the highlight of this episode!
This time, we let the two cars drive on the same path without interruption at the same time, and the test conditions covered almost all the scenarios that can be encountered in daily life, such as urban areas, highways, and congestion. The requirement can not be turtle speed, nor can it be accelerated or decelerated frequently.
The total distance of the test is about 105 kilometers, the time is about 3.5 hours, and the average speed is about 28km/h. Guess who will win?
Measured fuel consumption is "flattened" again
As a result, the two cars were once again "tied". At least in terms of performance fuel consumption, the driving computer of both vehicles shows 4.7L/100km.
In actual calculations, the fuel consumption data of the two cars is also extremely close, and the difference of 0.03L is about two or three bottle caps.
In addition, this also shows that the apparent fuel consumption of these two cars is more accurate, and you can give a thumbs up.
Under different road conditions
The fuel consumption of the two vehicles is different
We found another interesting point during the testing process - the fuel consumption of the two cars is different in different road conditions.
In congested sections, the Fuel Consumption of Tucson L Hybrid is higher, and the highest apparent fuel consumption has reached 5.1L/100km. I think that at low speeds, the car's engine will sometimes start to participate in the drive, and it will inevitably consume some fuel.
On the highway, the apparent fuel consumption will fall back to about 4.7L/100km. In addition to the assistance of the motor, I think the 6AT gearbox also plays a positive role in reducing fuel consumption.
Cr-V hybrid has lower fuel consumption in congested road conditions, and the lowest fuel consumption has dropped to 4.3L/100km. After all, in this case, cr-V hybrids are basically operated in pure electric mode, and it is normal to have low fuel consumption.
At high speed, the fuel consumption of the meter will rise to 4.7L/100km. In addition, in i-MMD systems, the wheels can only be driven at a fixed drive ratio when the engine is directly driven, and the speed matching is not as flexible as that of the Tucson L hybrid.
Of course, both cars are fuel-efficient in mixed road conditions. At least in our actual measurements, the hyundai TMED hybrid performance is not inferior to the Honda i-MMD.
Above, for the daily performance of the hybrid system of the two cars, I can give a conclusion. They are all at the same level in the three main aspects of acceleration, noise control, and fuel consumption. Is this the same result as you imagined?
Vehicle comparison
After talking about the hybrid system, let's talk about the two cars themselves.
devise
First of all, from the appearance point of view, the cr-V hybrid design is more mature and stable, in line with the mainstream aesthetics of most household consumers, but there are no highlights.
In terms of interior, CR-V is older after all, with some sense of age, but it is consistent with the positioning of the model, and it is a warm style at home. The central control screen is small, and the fluency is almost interesting, but the daily functions are not absent, and the storage space is abundant.
The Tucson L Hybrid has a more personal look, using a parametric diamond front grille and a forward grille integrated with daytime running lights, which is highly recognizable. Overall, it looks younger and more dynamic than the CR-V hybrid.
Interior, because the Tucson L Hybrid is a new car, the design style can provide a stronger sense of freshness, the two large screens cater to the sense of technology that many people now pursue, the functionality and fluency are also better, and the convenience of the storage space is not bad.
space
Space has always been Honda's strength, with plenty of space in the rear, comfortable seating, flat floors and wide armrests. The trunk is very wide and has functions such as a seat reclining handle and lights.
But there is a problem, that is, the battery is placed under the rear seat, encroaching on some of the bottom space of the trunk.
The extended Tucson L Hybrid surprised me in terms of spatial comfort, except that the seat padding was not so soft, and the CR-V hybrid was not lost in every way. Its rear seat backrests have a wider range of angle adjustments, making it easy for me to find a very comfortable sitting position.
Its trunk is also very large, with seats with reclining handles and lights, and the hybrid system or battery does not encroach on the trunk space. As you can see, there is also a large storage space under the trunk cover of the Tucson L hybrid.
disposition
In the same price range of early 200,000, Tucson L Hybrid offers a richer choice of configurations, 360 Ring Shadow, Steep Slope Slow, Electric Trunk, 64-color Mood Light, Seat Heating and other practical configurations are not available in the CRV Hybrid version at the same price.
Of course, if you don't have high requirements for configuration, cr-V hybrid is definitely enough for home use. However, in terms of technology and convenience configuration, Tucson L hybrid may bring you surprises.
Chassis performance
The CR-V hybrid chassis performance is mainly comfortable, and the shock absorber is very gentle for filtering large and small vibrations, and it can also provide a certain sense of luxury. Its steering action is very calm, not fluttering or thief, and the steering wheel feels good.
However, when driving intensely, you will feel that the CR-V hybrid has a "big car feeling", the movement is slightly slow, and the body is not light.
The Tucson L Hybrid is tuned differently, and just like its appearance, it not only looks more sporty than the CR-V, but also more athletic when open. Its suspension and steering are tighter and tougher. Although it is occasionally a bit bumpy, the ride comfort is slightly inferior to the CR-V, but it also belongs to the degree of texture and not dispersion, which makes me feel very similar to a European car.
summary
After some comparison, I found that although the Tucson L hybrid is different from the CR-V hybrid in terms of hybrid architecture and principle, the actual performance level, whether it is fuel consumption or power, is difficult to distinguish and equally excellent.
In terms of model style, there is a clear difference between the two cars. CR-V hybrids are more calm, comfortable and prefer home-oriented. The Tucson L Hybrid is younger, offers some driving pleasure, and there are no shortcomings in terms of space practicality and configuration level. In terms of technology and functional configuration, Tucson L hybrid is slightly better. In terms of overall product strength, Tucson L Hybrid is qualified to challenge the benchmark CR-V Hybrid.
In addition, to add the market information, the specific information is shown in the following figure:
So who would you choose for these two cars? Please state your choice in the comments section!