This year's Spring Festival, I chatted with my friends about a very interesting topic, and there was a controversy, is human nature inherently good, or is sex inherently evil? The theory of "the beginning of man" and "nature is inherently evil" was put forward by Xun Zi, and this theory was put forward

This year's Spring Festival, I chatted with my friends about a very interesting topic, and there was a controversy, is human nature inherently good, or is sex inherently evil?

The theory of "the beginning of man" and "nature is inherently evil" was put forward by Xunzi, which is contrary to the "beginning of man" and "nature is good", but I personally believe that Xunzi's statement is more rational.

Xun Zi made a more realistic exposition of this statement, and he defined human nature as follows: "The reason why people are natural is called sex", that is, "sex" is a natural, innate and primitive natural attribute, a natural instinct that is not to be learned. According to Xun Zi's statement, I observe in my daily life that newborn babies really have no so-called "goodness."

Babies cry, cry when they don't get what they want, grab things from people, and never consider whether they have bitten their mothers when they drink milk.

Some newborn birds in the animal kingdom bite their weakest siblings to get more food from their parents.

Obviously, this can't be said to be good, right? If it's two babies but only one bottle, they'll compete with each other, what's the goodness? Children still know how to protect food, and they are born selfish.

People's growth has undergone education, transformation and the baptism of the legal system to have the concept of "good", especially today if there is no legal constraint, it will be an era of "eating evil with evil".