The development of new energy vehicles so far, battery life has always been a concern of consumers, in order to cater to consumers, the new forces of car manufacturing is to change the method to increase the endurance, some choose to increase the storage capacity of the battery, some choose to increase the number of battery packs, but from the actual point of view, these "fancy" operations really do not have much significance!
Let's put it this way! Car battery capacity is like the fuel tank volume of the current fuel car, how far a tank of oil can run also means how long the full power can last, saying that the two are equivalent exchange is no problem, but strictly speaking, the actual mileage of a tank of fuel is more real than the mileage of a tram in the state of full power, because the battery life of the tram There is a problem of "virtual standard", although now some car companies have launched a version of the endurance of thousands of miles, but the charging is not so faster than refueling, less than half an hour to an hour, more than a small half a day, So as Musk said, it really doesn't seem like much point to have too long a battery life.
In fact, so far, there are still some consumers who are resistant to new energy vehicles, and some do not want to understand at all, so have you ever thought about it, what is the root cause of this part of the consumer resistance to new energy vehicles?
Since the rise of new energy vehicles, with the wings of the major new car-making forces gradually plump, they will be "endurance anxiety" spearhead pointed to the mileage, do not know that this "playing style" is contrary to what consumers think, but this can not be completely attributed to the current new forces of car-making, because of technical reasons, improving the mileage is currently able to maintain the "rejuvenation" of new energy vehicles.
I would like to say that consumers are not actually resisting the new energy vehicle itself, but resisting some of the many problems brought about by the new energy vehicle. Someone has calculated an account, a 45L fuel tank car, 100 kilometers of 8 oil, in the case of full oil, can run more than 500 kilometers, in fact, this currently popular pure electric vehicle mileage is almost the same. The mileage is almost the same, but as we said earlier, the refueling time and charging time, the two can not be equated, so this is the first slot point for consumers to new energy vehicles.
The second slot point, the loss of fuel vehicles and pure electric vehicles in their endurance can not be equated.
You think, fuel vehicles run for a few years, its actual mileage will not change much, and pure electric vehicles? The loss is much greater than that of fuel vehicles.
Number planning of the third slot point, gas stations and charging piles! Obviously, in this regard, the gas station is completely successful, and the layout of the charging pile is still in a "rare" state, not long ago Tesla also issued a statement directly on this matter, overtime occupation of charging piles according to 6.4 yuan / min calculation, which shows how scarce the charging pile is.
In the fourth slot, new energy vehicles of the same grade are a little more expensive than fuel vehicles. In this way, although new energy vehicles can save fuel money, if you add the maintenance cost of the battery in the later stage, it seems that the cost of new energy vehicles and fuel vehicles are not bad, and there is not much advantage.
Write at the end
In this way, the endurance is too long indeed does not have much practical significance, the root cause of consumer resistance to new energy, is nothing more than its later maintenance costs, charging efficiency is too slow, charging pile layout is too small, of course, there are new energy vehicle retention rate and some consumers are not used to new energy vehicles and other miscellaneous reasons.