In the latest news on April 15, 2022, Beijing time, snooker observer Chris expressed his views on iran's controversial remarks, but this time, he did not choose to side with O'Sullivan, but decisively chose to support Waffy's views. Iran's goowafi said after completing the promotion that O'Sullivan had publicly stated that he did not want his children to engage in snooker and brought great disaster to the stage. So Wafi thinks that instead of letting O'Sullivan continue to hurt snooker like this, it would be better to let him quit the stage early to make room for others.
Chris: I support Waffy's view
In Chris's view, there is nothing wrong with Waffy's point of view, because O'Sullivan, as the best player in the world, has not really helped the sport. Chris said: "Of all the issues Waffy talked about, I was the one who supported his point of view. O'Sullivan is certainly the best player in the world, winning 20 of the three major tournaments. But this is still limited to the development of snooker, in a way, he helped snooker to get better development, but this is not the result of his active efforts, but his playing style and personality. Like Wafi said, if you want to make snooker better, you should bring more big brand sponsorship, he keeps saying that he works hard for snooker, but he never takes any substantive action, which is not right. ”
Wafi: O'Sullivan should make room for others
In wafi's previous remarks, he said that if O'Sullivan is not capable of helping snooker get better, then he should make way for those who are truly capable. Wafi said: "I've always been a good friend of O'Sullivan, but I think a lot of his remarks are hurting snooker. In this case, I think there should be someone around him to remind him that he shouldn't do this. If O'Sullivan hadn't had the people around him and his team, he wouldn't have been on the world stage. And he always likes to compare himself with others, to compare me with other people, but I don't like to be compared. What I'm trying to say is don't disrespect people just because you're O'Sullivan. O'Sullivan deserves to be treated fairly, not because he is O'Sullivan and has privileges. He kept saying he was going to promote snooker, but he didn't do anything, and if he didn't have the ability, I think he could choose to retire and let other people lead us to do it. ”
Chris: It's very difficult to get fair
Although Chris explicitly supports Waffy's view, he thinks that Waffy's idea is still too idealistic because it is too difficult to implement. Chris said: "Snooker is only a niche sport, its field can accommodate a very limited number of people, and the crowd of people who like snooker will never be very large, which is an objective fact. O'Sullivan's failure to make snooker bigger was not his problem, but the peculiarities of the sport. And when it comes to whether the fans treat the players fairly, I think the passion of the fans for the players depends on themselves, they don't need to be rational, they just need to love the player. So the fair treatment that Wafi wants is still too idealistic, and for now, I think it's very difficult to make sure that everyone has money. While I support Wafi's criticism of O'Sullivan, I don't think his views are 100% correct. For snooker, it is undoubtedly more difficult to get treated like a football player than to ascend to the sky. This is what I need to tell young people, many things can only be known if you do it yourself, and real criticism is based on the actual situation. Still, I admire young people like this because they're starting to care about snooker's future. With more young people like this, I think the future of Snooker will naturally get better and better, and I have confidence in young people like Wafi and Trump. ”