#无人机拍到金门 "sentry photo", the Taiwan soldiers looked confused, and the way of driving to amuse netizens ##台方: The People's Liberation Army drone took a photo of the Kinmen sentry #
Text/Fat Guy Eggplant
After the insiders of the "Taiwan Military" admitted that there was indeed such a thing, the Tsai Ing-wen authorities jumped out to "refute the rumors" and insisted that the mainland drone did not fly over kinmen -- however, the US media unceremoniously punched their faces: Why did the soldiers at the scene throw stones?
According to a report by the Global Network citing the "Theater" website on August 25, a few days ago, a civilian drone "visited" the "Taiwan Army" defense zone on the Kinmen Islands. When the photos taken by the drone began to go viral on the Internet platform, some "Taiwan military" insiders and Taiwan media military reporters confirmed the matter and believed that the civilian drone may belong to the People's Liberation Army. However, perhaps feeling that such a thing is really humiliating, the Tsai Ing-wen authorities jumped out and insisted that the drone did not fly over the Golden Gate.
A spokesman for the "Taiwan Military's Kinmen National Defense Command" stood up and declared that the drone passed "near the coast of Lieyu Town" and flew at an altitude of 3,300 feet (about 1,005 meters). He stressed that the drone did not enter the "airspace" of Kinmen. In addition, he also said that the "Taiwan military" sent a radio alarm to the drone, and the soldiers also took measures to intercept and drive away the drone - and for the photo of the "close-up shooting of the Taiwan military post", he explained that it was taken with the telephoto camera on the drone, when the drone was still a long distance away from the post.
However, a video that immediately followed made the face of the "Taiwan army" and even the Tsai Ing-wen authorities completely disgraced. A video shows that when the drone was "cruising" the facility at a low speed, several Taiwan soldiers on the ground first looked at it sluggishly, and then quickly took "interception measures" - of course, not with any jamming equipment, but by throwing stones at the drone on the ground. The picture shows that the stones thrown by these soldiers actually almost hit the drone. However, the "Taiwan military" claimed that the drone flew at an altitude of more than 1,000 meters at that time. An article on the "War Zone" website pointed out that humans can generally only reach a height of about 50 meters when throwing stones with their bare hands. Therefore, judging from the video, the height of this drone should be within 50 meters, so these "Taiwan army" soldiers can find it in time and try to throw stones away from it. It can be seen that the so-called rebuttal of rumors by the "Taiwan army" is completely a lie.
In addition, the "Taiwan military" also claimed to have issued a warning to the drone - but they first pointed out that it was a small civilian drone. However, in fact, civilian consumer-grade drones basically do not have the airborne UHF/VHF antennas required for air traffic control to transmit and receive voice communication signals, so it is impossible for this drone to hear their so-called "shouting". If the "Taiwan military" is not lying, it can only prove that their level is really poor: even the most basic common sense that consumer-grade drones do not have radio antennas, these "professional soldiers" do not know?
Whether this drone belongs to tourists or the People's Liberation Army, it is a fact that the "Taiwan Army" is now humiliated. Of course, this is not the first time that our drone has recently gone to the other side of the "tour". After Pelosi channeled the platform, two unmanned aerial vehicles belonging to the People's Liberation Army swung around the Golden Gate, causing a high degree of tension among the "Taiwan army", but they were not able to take any effective countermeasures, and could only fire a signal bomb warning.
First of all, it was impossible to stop the people's liberation army's drones, and now it can't even stop the consumer-grade civilian drones, and I don't know where the Tsai Ing-wen authorities had the courage to dare to "resist reunification by force" or how they dared to declare to the vast number of Taiwan compatriots that "Taiwan is very safe." And I believe that the broad masses of Taiwan compatriots have probably already seen the fierceness of these "Taiwan independence" elements.