Yunnan "handsome guy old table 5xx" user message: "In fact, the state cares very much about the old private teachers, and has also dealt with the original private teachers in an all-round way, without any so-called legacy problems! 95% of the original private teachers have become regulars, they like to run big, and they are enjoying their old age with a pension that is not low, which fully shows that the state attaches great importance to the original private teachers, so that the group of private teachers has drawn a perfect end." As for the fact that less than 5 percent of them have been eliminated, they are not former private teachers, but at most they have been eliminated as private teachers, right? In fact, they have returned to the peasants. People are really tired of being eliminated from the competition and boasting about their contributions all day long, begging and begging, which is annoying! Besides, you can give as much as you want, which means that you are worth it. Who's going to throw away good shoes?"
This is the one who makes such remarks about the former private teacher, and this one is really curious about him, and I want to go to the homepage to see the "style". A total of 97 "works", except for a few self-congratulatory, the rest are aimed at former private teachers.
Almost all of them are comments on other people's copywriting, even if it is their own "tofu block" essay, it is indispensable to attack and abuse the former private teachers. Glancing at the video he posted, he is also not small. In terms of age, it should be a student of a private teacher or he is a private teacher who has become a regular teacher. I don't understand, he is hostile to the former private teacher, and it seems that he has surpassed the deep hatred of killing his father and taking his wife and daughter.
"Problems left over from history", supplementary registration of "missing" private teachers, and so on, are the conclusions of history on what is now called the substitute teachers of the former private teachers. Do they exist, and how can they be influenced?
"There is no policy document" is a fool's dream. In recent years, the Ministry of Education has repeatedly pointed out that the three ministries and one office [2011 (No. 8)] is the programmatic and the last document to solve the problem of "substitute teachers". Isn't it as powerful as its rhetoric?
Every comment he made was indispensable to "95% of the former private teachers have become regulars", "they are happy to run", and "5% have been eliminated".
"95% of the former private teachers have become regulars", which really makes people scoff and laugh off their big teeth. Whoever makes people surrender to their feet, they must have reasons and evidence to convince them. What is the concept of non-government teachers? How are former non-government teachers characterized? If 95 percent of former non-government teachers have become regulars? How can we now talk about former non-government teachers? This is not just a conceptual deviation, but a mistake of principle. Private teachers can't be regularized by the definition of the deadline to have the original private teachers, don't talk nonsense, otherwise you will be "no level".
"Xi Da Puben" is an Internet term, "Pu Da Xi Ben". It is the abbreviated form of "happy to hear, happy, celebrated with the whole world, and run to tell each other". Say something that makes everyone happy, and everyone should share it, tell each other, and celebrate together. This headline user, with good intentions, also used a hot word on the Internet. It's just that he is clever and clever and wrong, and the original meaning of this word is to share happy things with everyone. According to what he said, 95% of the former private teachers became regulars, and they were happy. Even if there is such a thing, those people have turned positive, and no one has seen anyone put on a "regular banquet" to share happiness. This may be the interpretation of his "handsome guy and old watch 5 ××" screen name - he is good at boasting, even if he has a "thief heart" and wants "5.20", he doesn't dare, and uses "5.30" to perfunctory.
Being high-profile means being spurned by others, and it is true that you have the heart and no courage. Moreover, the former private teachers turned black and white upside down, and they were in the air. No, isn't he even more annoying?
I don't know where this user got this data, when I was a private teacher in the township central primary school in 85, there were 66 teachers in the township, and there were less than 20 public teachers. Those of us stayed up until we had the opportunity to become regulars, and only 14 of them were converted in the whole township, because they were taught before the deadline set by our province. Qualifications, good luck. Others did not know that there was a deadline when they were hired, and were later dismissed or dismissed for various reasons. I remember that in the year when the pension subsidy was applied for the former private teachers, the township approved and implemented, and there were more than 58 people with more than five years of teaching experience. What is the proportion of those who are called substitute teachers, and those private teachers who have no name, that is, former private teachers, are only 5 percent?
Cleaning up and rectifying the ranks of private teachers can also be regarded as a major move by the state in education, and it is understandable. However, the deadline is lagging behind that of private teachers. It is inevitable that these private teachers feel that they have fallen into the net, they are not stupid, they have done stupid things.
Let's be honest, the situation was too complicated at the time, and everyone's situation was different. I was hired as a primary school teacher in 85, and after working for a thousand years, I learned that there was a private teacher registered at the end of 84, but at that time I still had more than 30 "non-registered", and these absent teachers were the backbone of teaching in the school. In this way, it is inevitable that he has been wronged.
And this headline user also said bluntly, "It means that you are worth this, who will throw away good shoes?" Hey, is there still a little quality in this? Didn't he say that "95% of the former private teachers have become regulars", is this 95% of the "former private teachers" also shoes?
Don't say it in advance, don't blame it and punish it without teaching. Speaking with a conscience, whether it is to argue for an explanation, or to seek justice, this is the popular psychology of former private teachers. To give or not to give, to make up more and make up for less, you and other common people have very little meaning. Unexpectedly, this headline user was angry, his heart was warm, and his hand was stretched out, didn't he also want a piece of the pie?