Just made up for the Redmi Turbo 3 press conference,I also watched some media reviews,To be honest, the cost performance of the 1999 start is okay,But compared with the friends who are getting more and more rolled now,It's a bit not enough。
First of all, the processor,The first is equipped with Snapdragon 8Gen3s,Doesn't it sound very strong?What do you say about this processor?,The name is very chicken thief,It looks similar to this year's top flagship processor Snapdragon 8Gen3,There is even an extra "s", If you don't know it in detail, according to the naming rules of the mobile phone model, this is no more powerful than Snapdragon 8gen3.
However, the actual difference is very large. Judging from the measured data, the CPU performance of this processor is about the same as that of Snapdragon 8gen2, but the energy efficiency is worse, similar to that of Snapdragon 7+ gen3, and the GPU performance and energy efficiency are between Snapdragon 8gen2 and Snapdragon 8+. Therefore, it is not only inferior to 8gen3, but also has a significant gap compared with 8gen2, which can only be called the overclocked version of Snapdragon 7+gen3 or Snapdragon 8++, but as a mid-range machine, this performance is enough.
The screen is not bad, 1.5k resolution, 2400nits peak brightness, green mountain eye protection, low brightness support1920HZPWM high-frequency dimming. But it's not as good as OnePlus overall, and it's the screen that this price segment should have. I'm curious.,What does the average quality screen of Redmi lead?The just-released realme GTNeo6SE screen is more leading, right?
As for other aspects, it's more general. For example, the LYT600 main camera, in fact, is the main camera with a 1/1.953-inch bottom, and the Sony IMX882 of the friend is basically the same thing, nothing special. The battery life is the smallest in the mid-range of this generation, 5000mAh, the charging speed is average, the combination of competing products is generally 100w+5500mAh, and the iQOO Z9 turbo next door is a little ruthless, and the battery is 6000mAh.
Therefore, for this mobile phone, my evaluation is that the cost performance is not as good as Redmi K70, and even inferior to friends in the same period. Because turbo3 also castrated GPS,It's single-frequency,The price is not very fragrant.,Plus 200 can buy K70,Drop a hundred and you can also get on GTNeo6SE。。。 It's a bit tasteless, and it's a pity to throw it away.