What kind of goods were in Dracula's coffin?

What kind of goods were in Dracula's coffin?

Dracula, also known as Dracula, is the culmination of all vampire novels. The novel is 100 or 200 years old. Vampires have gone from an ancient Eastern European legend to a part of the world's pop culture. But the profound significance of Dracula's original work is little known.

Today we will take a look at what kind of goods are in Dracula's coffin. First of all, there is no doubt that Dracula is a horror novel. To understand the significance of this novel, it is necessary to understand what the author of the novel is afraid of. What is the fear of this lead singer who continues to be a reactionary literati in england's old colony? What kind of terror exists that makes the scum traitor of the Irish nation tremble with color.

The first thing that comes with Western civilization is Christianity. Blood has an extraordinary symbolic meaning in Christian culture. The Christian communion and the holy wine symbolize the flesh and blood of Jesus, and believers eat them before speaking. We eat the flesh of Jesus and drink His blood, and life becomes one with Him. As Dracula put the movie in 1992 said. Blood is life. When teaching non-Jewish Christians, Paul, the great sage of Christianity, emphasized that foreign eating habits are acceptable, except that blood products should not be used, because the Old Testament says that eating his blood is to harm his life, and whether it is man or beast, Jehovah will pay you the blood debt. So Dracula as a must in order to eat the blood of others. Monsters that survive for survival. Itself is a trampling on Christian doctrine.

The so-called Christian Christ Jesus is their spiritual benchmark. Christian teachers have repeatedly emphasized that the only human being who can rise from the dead or raise people from the dead is Christ Jesus. But the count in the novel seems to be an exception. He has been executed in history, but he rises in the graves of ancient times and runs rampant in the Victorian era in which the author lived. It seems that it is also possible for him to use special techniques. Let Miss Lucy. Rise up from your own grave. For the evil side. Dracula seemed to have Joseph's powers. Can it compete with the image of the only God in the universe on earth? As a writer of reactionary imperialism and ideas that penetrate deep into the marrow of the marrow, BraxTook certainly does not give us such an explanation. He emphasized that Dracula was neither called resurrection nor dead, but used an ambiguous word on bed. What does it mean? The living dead. Sounds like a ridiculous term. So according to the author's assumptions. Dracula had no life. Just a moving corpse. He has only his own thoughts and independent consciousness, so he cannot eat or drink, but he maintains a life that ordinary people cannot match with blood, which is the most taboo thing in the Christian world.

No matter how much the author disguises it, how much he emphasizes in the later period, the life of the earl cannot be compared with the creation of God, but this image exerts a great impact on the Christian worldview, the concept of life, so that when Blackstock was alive. He was not less hurt by the pig teammates of the same camp, saying that he was invading literature and a blasphemy against the sacred teachings of Christianity. What a Celtic scum that exalted this reactionary Celtic nation!

Whoever says more money won't bite the hand. The side effects of huge amounts of capital are already eating these ones back. The lords sitting on the spire of the pagoda, the nobles of the Victorian era, were too powerful. The moral standards on which they are maintained, God will eventually be king. Of the derivatives they themselves have created with capital, they are so vulnerable. Take their so-called Christian doctrine. It is the whole system of reactionary morality based on the far-fetched attachment to the text of the Bible. We face unprecedented crises and challenges.

Author Brax Tok as a scum of a Celtic nation. Pretty clowns destined to be nailed to the column of shame in history. However, he was more worried about the country and the people than Miao Zhenggen's red Yang Grusaxon Old Leaf. At the time of the creation of the novel, it was already the end of the Victorian era. The so-called British Empire, which never sets the sun, is beautiful on the surface, but inland it has long been prosperous and declining. Internally, there are sharp class contradictions. The bourgeois upper echelons are corrupt and corrupt. And external. The United States and Russia, as well as Prussia and Germany, are countries with more potential for development. It constantly challenged Britain's supremacy that it had maintained for more than 100 years. It can be described as internal and external troubles.

The new scientific and technological products and social emerging things after the Industrial Revolution continue to impact the ancient way of life and the concept of values, whether it is the proletariat at the bottom of society or the capitalists and aristocrats on the spire of the pagoda. Both are facing enormous challenges and shocks. In these prosperous years, which seem to be blooming on the surface, everyone has an extremely strong sense of crisis in their hearts. One year old. As a hard-working man of the reactionary class, Blackstock is soberly aware that the great enemy of ending the old society is coming, but who is he? If you can't find one ready-made, create one first. As a drill and vaccine in the field of spiritual thought. The net map unites the crumbling reactionary classes once again, or for the last time.

Blackstock as an idealistic counter-activist may never know. Who is the real gravedigger for him and his evil master, but it doesn't matter. There was no one created to practice. Vaccinations. In his strong shot, lying in college, for a second constantly adding to him, reactionary and evil black goods. He can't stop praising himself, even borrowing the tone of others, touting his own primitiveness, and how wise and brave Jonathan Hack is created based on himself. What a contrived word to describe Miss Lucy's chastity. I remember there was such a very fleshy passage in the novel. "Oh, sometimes I wonder why a woman can't call three men, and how nice it would be if she could have it at the same time, but I know it's heresy." Note that the word heresy does not mean in English. In the case of heresies resulting from the misinterpretation of Christian doctrine. The use of this ancient and dignified vocabulary in conversations with girlfriends is evident in its contrivedness. When it comes to depicting the working people guarding the nautical old man zoo, they are depicted with no ink and ink. And nothing to know. When it comes to the so-called heroes, what kind of tone is used to praise them, texas warriors are brave and good at fighting. Excellent students in medical school are only eight buckets high. In the end, Miss Lucy chose, the gentleman of the British Empire, what a majesty.

But as a result, no matter how painstakingly the author, the most eye-catching and most brilliant character in the whole novel is none other than Count Dracula. This reactionary is trying to hit the target. Far from being suppressed by the author with his despicable tricks. Instead, the image of the vampire has continued to evolve and perfect in countless derivative works of later generations. He became a progressive writer, a metaphor for the reactionary capitalist society, and the pen and ink weapon that eats the essence of man.

The so-called positive image in the book is nothing more than the projection of the reactionary class, which is often dull, and count Dracula, the bad man he wants to create. But it is the most vivid and full in the whole novel. Differently. Count Dracula ordered takeaways directly in the way that was closest to the bourgeois way of life. It was also Jonathan Hack's most unable to refuse to let the prey deliver to his door. In contrast, the demons of the Western tradition are nothing more than that. The flame-filled dragon is at best an unintelligent beast. What is the sister in the oriental image? It is nothing more than a gentle image of the female ghost who deceives the prince into bed. Not like Count Dracula. Use the form of commercial cooperation that capitalist society can hardly reject in a mercenary capitalist society. Get his prey. It is a mockery of the reactionary forces of the bourgeoisie, who are lifting stones and hitting themselves on their feet. He was a well-known person in history before his death, and left his luck in the history of Qingqing, crossing the Hanhai Sea for four or five hundred years, coming to the Victorian era, and continuing to make waves! And he wasn't wasting jonathan's time in his study and seeing the thick rows of British almanacs. Although the Count's English was not so authentic, Jangarthan could understand it completely, and even Jonathan himself admitted that the Count already had it. The language skills required for communicating in Victorian London. The way in which the bourgeois world was attacked was also carried out in accordance with the most advanced model of commercial organization of the Victorian era, created by the bourgeoisie. All show a terrible boldness that frightens the bourgeois reactionary forces of the whole world. Because the Count had legal documents, they could not break into the Count's stronghold illegally. It is also a very perfect trust mechanism in the capitalist world. Let the Count finish eating a ship of sailors. You can completely ignore it, lie quietly in your coffin, waiting for the relevant personnel. Properly safe and uninformed, new bases are opened up in the heart of the capitalist world. And the opposite. Ladies and gentlemen of the bourgeois world. Bound by rules created by yourself.

What does all this reflect? As a reactionary bourgeois literati, Braxtocker would never have thought that he and his masters of sorrow and joy would be overthrown by the working people who had created all the wealth for them and called upon them. Instead, it has set its sights on the periphery of the Western world and the rising non-Western world. Watch out for areas that were economically exported by their past colonial enslavements after the awakening. Doves occupy the magpie's nest. Don't give them an imperialist aggression. these. Once a noble hand, I was most afraid that others would take their butcher knives and cut off their heads. So the fear of Dracula is their fear of Hannibal against Attila, of all the periphery of the Western world or of the non-Western world. It is also a fear of unconventional cells within the Western world such as the early Kaiser Wilhelm Mosolini Hitler.

Relative to others. stiff. The hollow frontal character Van Helsing is an alternative. Although the same is the projection of the bourgeois reactionary class in the literary world. But this one stands out among the so-called positive characters in all novels. Although it is not yet able to compete with Count Dracula in the whole play, it is also a more interesting role. Although the same is the projection of the reactionary class in literature, however. Van Helsing represents the bourgeoisie. The spirit of those people is the voice of the bourgeois entrepreneurial rise era. It is also the image of the colonists and their ancestors who sailed sailboats and used rough machinery to open up new markets and new routes. Seems more bold. Compared with other dull figures, there is a strong sense of power. I remember a passage in the novel where the earl, because he had a legitimate ownership of the house, such people did not dare to search, because they would be physically taken away by the police. However, at night, the chance of being physically taken away by the police will decrease. But the Dragon City was when the Earl's mana was at its strongest. The crowd did not know how to show goodwill for a while, but Professor Van Helsing had the strength to exclude the public opinion! He told everyone a story here, what is the story? A thief smashed the glass open and ran in, changing into a decent outfit. It is precisely because this thief has done a good job. The heart did not beat, the face was not red, there was no sacrifice in the face of the police, changed into the master's clothes, pretended to be the owner who forgot to bring the key. Fooled. Everyone, and the builder, made an agreement to demolish the house, and when the owner returned, he found that his home had been flattened. So Van Helsing said, we just want to look bright and busy industrial society when there are many people, and no one will care what we do? What is it? This is a true portrayal of the generation of tyrants who fought the world in the so-called British Empire. albeit. The same goes. The opposite of the course of history. But it is better than their descendants. See a lot. What does this reflect? This reflects the reactionary's delusion that restoring a little of his old spirit and customs could make him terminally ill. Reactionary rule comes back to life. The course of history tells us that this is a dream.

The image of Count Dracula will naturally not be the image of the future reactionary class gravediggers, but it will be a projection of the various crisis consciousnesses in their minds. It shows the weakness of their doom. This two hundred years. Since Dracula came out. The image of the vampire was constantly given different meanings by various people and horses, and gradually became part of the world's popular culture. Its meaning is also moving in the direction of diversification.