Recently, two poultry slaughtering and processing factories in Binzhou, Shandong and Qingfeng, Henan were exposed by the Beijing News because of the problem of dirty mess.
This is not unusual, but what is strange is that after the reporter contacted the regulatory department in Binzhou, Shandong, he received a call from the company involved, and the person in charge of the company said that the number was given by "Director Li" of the relevant department.
I think there is no need to describe how dirty and messy the production workshop of the company involved is, and it is no different from those food production enterprises exposed at the 3.15 party every year.
The only thing I'm interested in about is the fact that the reporter's phone was leaked.
The reason why the company involved wanted to call the reporter was either to buy or intimidate, or because they didn't want the reporter to continue to expose.
And the reason why "Director Li" wants to tell the reporter's number to the company is to sell the company's favors, and second, to let the company take the initiative to attack and level the media and control the situation to a minimum. If the matter cannot be covered and the enterprise is to be punished, then the regulatory authorities also seem to have done their best to "protect" the enterprise, and it is no wonder that there is a problem.
However, is this "protection" an act of supervision or the personal behavior of Director Li? We can guess that it may be that they have accepted benefits and willingly provided a protective umbrella for these non-compliant enterprises, or it may be the unspoken rules of the regulatory authorities to perform their regulatory functions. Because if there is a serious food safety problem in the local enterprise, then the relevant departments also need to be responsible. Excessive supervision may affect the operation of enterprises, and the implementation of food safety measures in place will inevitably increase the cost of enterprises and affect the benefits of enterprises. Therefore, it is not difficult to understand why food safety has been grasped for so many years, and it will still stay in the stage of "the people do not sue and the officials do not investigate".
Some time ago, there were many places where vendors used "ghost scales" to defraud customers, so a wide range of rectification of "ghost scales" began to act, traders must bring their scales to the market supervision department to accept verification, and even some market supervision departments also came up with new tricks, encouraging the public to go to the designated place to weigh their mobile phones, and affix the logo, as a weighing weight. But imagine that consumers use their mobile phones to check the scales when they buy things, will the merchants still sell them to you? Will it make it easy for you to leave?
In fact, instead of this, it is better for market supervision and law enforcement personnel to carry weights every day and randomly check the scales in the market.
Therefore, it is better to say than to do, if you use the spirit of checking electric vehicles to check food safety, I believe that food safety will inevitably improve qualitatively.