laitimes

"Pay public rations" = social security? Advocating that "peasants should enjoy retirement benefits" is not only ignorance!

author:Eat melon and rice

At the end of 2005, hundreds of millions of farmers were thrilled by the news that China would abolish agricultural taxes on January 1, 2006. Later, when a series of policies benefiting farmers such as "grain subsidies" were released, the people of the whole country were almost boiling...

"Pay public rations" = social security? Advocating that "peasants should enjoy retirement benefits" is not only ignorance!

Today, however, it is said:

"Pay public rations" = social security? Advocating that "peasants should enjoy retirement benefits" is not only ignorance!

No one can deny the contribution of the peasants, but the burden of the peasants was underestimated that year!

We are a large agricultural country with thousands of years of farming civilization. Historically, anyone who tries to denigrate the peasants and deny their contributions can only bring shame on themselves – after all, who is not a son of a peasant?

"Pay public rations" = social security? Advocating that "peasants should enjoy retirement benefits" is not only ignorance!

There is such a saying: during the three-year natural disaster, which coincided with the big brother in the north chasing debts, coupled with the imminent imminence of a large number of projects, including the atomic bomb research, it was our farmers who tightened their belts and supported the country with "public grain"!

"Pay public rations" = social security? Advocating that "peasants should enjoy retirement benefits" is not only ignorance!

The above statement may not be accurate, but at least it reflects some objective facts! However, the original situation is still beyond imagination: at that time, industry and commerce were almost thriving after a hundred wastes, and the relatively primitive and backward agricultural technology was not enough to support high yields, but we still relied on agriculture step by step to get to where we are today...

"Pay public rations" = social security? Advocating that "peasants should enjoy retirement benefits" is not only ignorance!

Agricultural tax is an obligation rather than a social security, and people who confuse the concept are either stupid or bad!

Now, there is a seemingly visceral appeal: ...

"Pay public rations" = social security? Advocating that "peasants should enjoy retirement benefits" is not only ignorance!

As if, public food = social security! As everyone knows, agricultural tax is the obligation of cultivators! There is an essential difference between the two - besides, it is certain: the one who runs and calls is not a diligent peasant!

"Pay public rations" = social security? Advocating that "peasants should enjoy retirement benefits" is not only ignorance!

Are people who confuse concepts really ignorant? We overestimate them -- we are afraid that they will play right and wrong under the banner of the peasants, and keep saying that they are asking for explanations for the peasants, but in fact they are creating antagonism and contradictions and destroying the excellent situation of stability and unity!

"Pay public rations" = social security? Advocating that "peasants should enjoy retirement benefits" is not only ignorance!
"Pay public rations" = social security? Advocating that "peasants should enjoy retirement benefits" is not only ignorance!