Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also can bring you different stories every day, thank you for your support, Xiaomei is polite!
In the streets, we often hear voices like: "Human traffickers are so hateful, they should be sentenced to death!" "But the reality is not so simple. Legal justice and sentencing considerations, the law is a fair scale, not an outlet for emotions. When sentencing, the law needs to consider not only the crime itself, but also the motive, means, and consequences of the crime. While the crimes of human traffickers are heinous, the imposition of the death penalty on all offenders may not be in line with the principles of legal justice. The purpose of the law in combating and preventing crime is not only to punish crime, but more importantly, to prevent crime. Imposing the death penalty on a uniform basis may make traffickers feel that they are "going to die anyway" and become more emboldened to commit crimes. On the contrary, appropriate sentencing and rehabilitation may allow criminals to realize their mistakes and reintegrate into society.
Loading...
Some of the real experiences shared by netizens below may give us some inspiration and insights
Beccaria, the originator of modern criminal law, once said, "The effectiveness of punishment does not lie in the severity of the punishment. Coolness, but in the timeliness and inevitability of the punishment.
It's much easier to catch a buyer than a human trafficker, and if you provide a little reward for reporting, there will naturally be neighbors staring at you, so how can the actual operation be nonsense?
If you buy a stolen car, you have to be sentenced, so why don't you have to sentence someone who buys a living car?
As a mother, I really want to eat human traffickers alive. However, the root of the problem is not with the traffickers, it is a problem of the big picture. If the root cause is not addressed, the death penalty will only exacerbate this contradiction.
But when the traffickers were finally caught, and after a while, they were released to sell human beings, so didn't the police become full-fed?
What is considered a serious circumstance? I think this amount is a bit empty, and at the end of the day, the cost of crime is still too low
Legislators are more concerned about the safety of trafficked children, which is different from drug trafficking
I have a question, the current child abduction and trafficking cases, the detection rate is less than 1 percent, will the judiciary really collapse?
Those who are trafficked to work as daughters-in-law/sex slaves/hard laborers/prostitutes/beggars are not immune to illegal detention and physical harm.
Returning to the question at the beginning, the fact that human traffickers cannot uniformly impose the death penalty is not the incompetence of the law, but the embodiment of the wisdom of the law and the complexity of society. Let us work together to make society more harmonious and beautiful through the power of law.
What do you think about this while watching the article? Feel free to share your insights in the comments section! See you in the comment section. Move the little hands to make a fortune to like + follow the little sister, I wish you all good luck and a fortune