Because of a debt dispute between Wan Moumou and Wang, Wan Moumou owed Wang Moumou 20,000 yuan, and Wan Moumou said that he would repay 10,000 yuan first, and the other 10,000 yuan would be repaid in two days.
When the date came, Wan Moumou arrived at the court with three bags of coins, and more than 10 people from the executive team and bank staff were counted, and after nearly 3 hours of counting, a total of 8,489 yuan of banknotes were exchanged, but there were still more than 1,400 yuan of coins that could not be exchanged.
Finally, the Longquanyi Court held that it was a passive execution, and made a penalty decision in accordance with relevant regulations: it was decided to fine Wan Moumou, the person subject to execution, 2,000 yuan. In the end, Wan Moumou paid the full fine on the same day.
There are many indications that the court's approach is not quite right.
Some netizens said: "It's a bit interesting, coins are not currency, so why should they be circulated." ”
Some netizens said: "Hey, I'm weird, it's negative to repay the money with coins, coins are not RMB?" Can you go to court? ”
Some netizens said: "I used to read the news, and those bosses who were in arrears of wages ended up carrying a bag of coins, why didn't anyone care?" ”
Some netizens even suggested that fines should be paid with coins.
Some netizens said: "What is called negative treatment, isn't the coin RMB?" I do a small business, is to touch coins, you want to be okay, that's all the coins, aren't the coins issued by the People's Bank of China? ”
So, is the basis of the court's decision reasonable? However, since the party has accepted the punishment, this matter can be regarded as the end of the curtain!
In addition to that, if it is a normal channel, then coins should definitely not be turned away.