Banks are also starting to "go on a diet"?
When the bigwigs in the financial world also start to implement "dieting" plans, linking credit cards, ATMs and our pockets to set limits, do you suddenly feel that the world is full of unfriendliness?
That's right, a recent ban in the banking industry has put the "freedom" of ordinary people in a small black room.
I'm going to talk to you today, what's going on?
The practical dilemma of "you can't swipe your card, it's difficult to transfer money".
"Hey, how are you going to spend your days?" This is Aunt Zhang's latest mantra.
In the past, when I was away from home, I had my mobile phone in my hand.
But now, under the bank's order, all ATMs and QR code withdrawals are "prohibited".
Even if she transferred money to her son to pay for tuition, she had to go to the bank for a morning, and Aunt Zhang's heart was cold.
No, netizens are also talking about it.
Someone said, "I can't do what I want with my money?" Some people also ridiculed: "We are guests of the bank, not the owners of the bank!" ”
The bank's helplessness
The bank said, "We can't help it, there are too many scammers now, there is no threshold, and everyone's money is not safe!" "We have to understand the bank's frustration.
Financial fraud methods are changing with each passing day, and banks have to be vigilant, even if it restricts our freedom, but also for the safety of our property.
But then again, does the bank's trick really work? Can those real liars be kept out of this limit? And we, honest people, have not suffered unjustified calamities?
The 'Cold War' Between Banks and Users
The bank's decision-making seems to be a little simpler and crude.
The "one-size-fits-all" policy has made us ordinary users a "fish in the pond".
Netizens complained one after another, saying that the bank's hand was "rather kill 3,000 by mistake than let go of one".
Banks need to reflect on this.
Between banks and users, it seems that there has been a "cold war".
The silence of the bank, the dissatisfaction of the users, and the doubts and incomprehension of both sides have become more and more tense under this "limit order".
The warm response of the bank and the expectations of users
Banks are not hard-hearted, in fact, they have a tender side.
Some banks have begun to actively respond to the voices of users, striving to improve service quality and optimize service processes.
"We hope to give users the best experience and make everyone feel our warmth and intimacy." A bank manager said.
The user's expectation is simple: "Make our money safer and freer." ”
What banks need to do is to try to meet the needs of users while ensuring security, so that users can feel respected and served.
The voice of the user, the reflection of the bank
When making decisions, banks listen more to the voices of users and consider problems from the perspective of users.
After all, the development of banks is inseparable from the support and trust of us, ordinary users.
Netizens are also actively speaking: "We hope that banks can be more transparent and humane." "Yes, transparency and humanity are two things that are especially precious in today's financial services.
The convenience and safety of financial life are our common pursuit
Finally, I would like to say that both banks and users are pursuing the same goal: the convenience and security of financial life.
Banks need our understanding and support, and we also need the services and guarantees of banks.
"Bank, you are our patron saint and our sweetheart." This sentence may sum up our relationship with banks very well.
In this relationship, we expect mutual understanding, mutual respect, and mutual growth.
What do you think, dear readers? What troubles have you encountered with the bank's "limit order"? What to expect? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area, let's discuss together, and speak out for a more convenient financial life together!