On July 16, Beijing time, the NBA Summer League staged a high-profile contest, with the Trail Blazers facing an unknown opponent. In this game, Choi Yong-hee became the center of attention with his outstanding performance, and although he only appeared briefly in the first half, he contributed 6 points and 1 assist with an efficient 3-pointer shooting rate, bringing a wave of small climaxes to the team.
Choi Young-hee's outstanding performance should have been a hot topic of discussion after the game, however, the Trail Blazers' head coach's substitution decision sparked widespread controversy. Choi Young-hee showed good form and positive impact on the team on the court, and his efficient three-point shooting and creative assists allowed the team to excel in his brief appearances. However, just when fans thought he would stay on the pitch and continue to show his talents, the head coach suddenly replaced him, a decision that sparked questions and discussions in the domestic and international media.
At home, many fans and commentators have said that the manager's substitution decision is puzzling. A netizen "basketball fanatic" posted on social media: "Choi Yong-hee is obviously the locomotive of the Trail Blazers' game, why did the head coach replace him so quickly? The team's tempo has obviously taken a toll on this. Another fan named "Basketball Rice" responded: "Maybe the head coach has his own style of play and plan, but this time I obviously didn't see Choi Yongxi's strength and potential." ”
And in the United States, netizens reacted more fiercely to this decision. There have been a lot of posts on social media discussing Choi Young-hee's performance and the manager's decision-making. A netizen who calls himself a "basketball fan" commented: "Choi Yong-hee's performance completely suppressed Bronny, he deserves more playing time, and the Trail Blazers should consider giving him a two-way contract." These words immediately aroused the resonance and discussion of other netizens, and "basketball true love fan" replied: "Although Brownie is not bad, but in today's game, Cui Yongxi showed a higher level of basketball wisdom and technology. ”
On the college basketball court, Bronny's performance has fallen short of expectations. He is only 1.88 meters tall, which is a disadvantage on the basketball court. In the 25 games he played, he shot just 36.6 percent from the field, 26.7 percent from three-point range and 67.6 percent from the free-throw line, all of which showed his lack of shooting ability.
In addition to shooting, Bronny also faced other technical challenges. He lacks the ability to handle the ball, cannot play the role of the team's main point of hand, and does not have enough individual attacking skills. These issues were particularly prominent during his college career.
Even more worrying is the fact that Bronny also has a history of heart disease, a major concern that could affect his future career. This fitness issue not only affects his physical condition, but can also limit his performance and staying power in the game.
In response to these problems of brownie, netizens also expressed their opinions during the discussion. Some argue that his height, while not the deciding factor, is a challenge in today's basketball arena. One netizen commented: "To stand out in such a competition, you must not only have excellent skills, but also physical condition. Bronny's height isn't too short, but he's sure to be lacking when it comes to rebounding and defending inside. ”
Regarding his shooting ability, another netizen has a more direct opinion: "The shooting rate of 36.6% looks really low, especially the three-point shot is only 26.7%, which has to be practiced hard." ”
Others focus on his ball-handling ability and attacking skills: "In college games, teams need a decent head control player who can organise attacks and break down opposition defences. Bronny really needs to strengthen this aspect, otherwise it will be difficult to establish himself at a high level. ”
The opinions of these netizens not only reflect the recognition of Choi Yong-hee's strength, but also express their incomprehension and dissatisfaction with the Trailblazers' substitution decision. They believe that Choi Young-hee's individual ability and performance in the game are enough for him to get more opportunities to play and bring more help and influence to the team. Despite this, Choi himself remained optimistic about the decision. "Whether it's with the Trail Blazers or any other team, I'm going to keep working hard and show my best," he said in an interview. ”
After Choi Yong-hee went off the court, the Trail Blazers lost a certain rhythm of the game. After the game, social media was filled with buzz about the manager's tactical decision. A netizen "basketball enthusiast" said in a comment: "When Choi Yong-hee came on the court, the team obviously had a better rhythm and offensive efficiency, but after he went off the court, the team's state declined significantly. Is the manager's decision-making too conservative and not making the most of his players? These words resonated with other fans, who expressed their recognition of Choi Yong-hee's individual ability and the overall state of the team during the game.
In the fan discussion area, the "eyes of basketball fans" even said bluntly: "Choi Yong-hee's three-point shooting rate and creative assists have significantly improved the overall performance of the Trail Blazers, how can such a performance replace him so quickly?" This view was quickly echoed by other netizens, with one "basketball critic" saying: "The head coach should trust the ability of the players more and not rely too much on on-the-spot tactical adjustments." ”
In the comments on live television, the commentator also expressed his displeasure with the manager's tactical decisions. He criticized: "The head coach is unclear about the team's three-point shooter strategy at key moments, and it has a big impact on the team's overall tactics. This comment once again raised questions among fans about the manager's tactical adjustments, and they believe that Choi Yong-hee's individual ability and the team's form have clearly increased, but the manager's substitution decision has failed to match the team's overall tactical needs, which is worth pondering.
According to a comprehensive analysis, Choi Yong-hee's performance not only showed his personal progress and ability in the game, but also sparked a wide discussion about the head coach's substitution decision. Netizens expressed their support for Choi Yong-hee and questioned the manager's tactical adjustments on social media.
On a basketball forum, netizen "Basketball Lovers" posted: "Choi Yong-hee's three-point shooting and offensive ability are outstanding, and his performance on the court has obviously driven the Trail Blazers' offensive power, but why did the head coach replace him so quickly?" The post quickly sparked discussion among other fans, with many agreeing that the head coach should make better use of Choi Young-hee's abilities.
In the televised commentary, the commentator also expressed dissatisfaction with the manager's tactical adjustments, and he bluntly said: "Choi Yong-hee's performance in the game has obviously improved the team's competitiveness, but the manager's substitution decision does not reflect an accurate grasp of the game situation." This criticism has once again sparked widespread attention, with fans having more room to discuss the manager's tactical adjustments.
In this summer league, Choi Yong-hee proved his worth with practical actions, and his performance not only brought the atmosphere of the team, but also brought new expectations to the fans.
Welcome to leave your valuable comments and opinions in the comment area, and look forward to discussing with you.
Note: Original. It is not easy, plagiarism and manuscript washing will be investigated. The picture comes from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete