The blockbuster population new deal is coming, and the maternity leave and subsidy system is coming!
In response to the persistently sluggish fertility rate, on July 21, the state announced three unprecedented new population policies to promote positive population growth.
The first is to improve the maternity leave system.
Second, a nationwide birth subsidy system will be established.
The third is to increase the deduction of individual income tax.
Video
Loading...
Significantly reduce the cost of raising babies for young people, and change the phenomenon of young people's low birthrate and childlessness.
Establish a national birth subsidy system
The country has finally seen that now the local government has introduced a lot of maternity insurance policies, each in charge of its own, there is no unity, and this time there will finally be a national system.
The internal document in Quanzhou, Fujian Province requires cadres to have three children, which will be announced in due course. Fujian is also a large fertility province, which shows how serious the population problem is.
The contribution of having a child should be the same across the country, and there were many problems with maternity insurance before.
In many places, maternity benefits can only be received when women are employed, and even if the husband pays maternity insurance, the woman cannot receive it.
Is the husband paying maternity insurance just for a few days of paternity leave?
Women suffer the same when they have children, and the contributions they make to have children are the same.
To encourage women to give birth, there should be no conditions for receiving them, and as long as they give birth to a child, they should receive maternity benefits.
Therefore, hurry up and implement the national birth subsidy policy to take care of every mother.
In addition to the second and third children to increase the maternity benefits, the first child should also be greatly rewarded.
Completely solve the problem of childlessness and declining birthrate.
It is recommended to expand the coverage of free education
Nine years of compulsory education is far from enough.
Now it's too rolly, private schools are the starting place of rolls, and the existence of private schools makes public schools roll up too.
The construction of private schools should be reduced, the education industry should be taken back, and public education should be arranged in a unified manner without charging fees.
In addition to the nine-year compulsory education, free high schools have also been discussed, and high schools are expected to be added to the scope of compulsory education. There are even proposals for free education to universities.
Write at the end
Whether so many preferential policies are useful or not is not necessarily.
Germany Korea Russia have directly paid for increasing the fertility rate, do you think it is useful?
It is difficult to reverse the downward trend of population all at once, is it a social and environmental problem that causes people to become selfish, or is it something else?
Are you looking forward to having a second or third child?
#夏日生活打卡季#