Wahaha was labeled as patriotic, probably after the death of the founder Zong Qinghou.
This is also the contrast formed after comparing "Wahaha" and the "farmer" on the Internet at that time. And this process shows that online public opinion can produce layers of overlapping effects. Whether it is a hero or a dog male is no longer qualitative for those traditional propaganda, and netizens are accustomed to picking up the answers they want from clues.
After the death of Zong Qinghou, his only daughter Zong Fuli took over the reins of the Wahaha Group, which was also expected by everyone, and people recognized this result. But unexpectedly, a letter from Zong Fuli to all employees of the group suddenly circulated on the Internet recently, saying that she decided to resign from the position of vice chairman and general manager of Hangzhou Wahaha Group from today (July 15) and no longer participate in its operation and management. The reason is that the People's Government of Shangcheng District of Hangzhou Municipality and some shareholders of Wahaha Company questioned the reasonableness of her operation and management of Wahaha Group after the death of Chairman Zong Qinghou, resulting in her being unable to continue to perform her management duties for Wahaha Group and its holding companies.
As soon as the news came out, it quickly caused an uproar on the Internet. Many people only now know that Wahaha is not a private enterprise, and it is not Zong Fuli who can have the final say. Many people are puzzled, as soon as Zong Qinghou died, the shareholders were in a hurry to drive Zong Fuli away, is this to sing a drama of seizing power across the river and demolishing the bridge?
Under the uproar of public opinion, I believe that the pressure on the local government and some shareholders of the controlling company has doubled, and they are afraid that they have not calculated that public opinion will have such a big impact, probably because they did not expect that the netizens' good impression of Zong Qinghou has long been Aiwu and Wu, Hui and his daughter.
In fact, the question of Zong Fuli's stay is an internal issue of Wahaha Group, and whether she has the ability to manage Wahaha Group or not, outsiders may not be able to make a conclusion.
After she took over, she was ready to implement her business philosophy and management style, which is also in line with the style of the new official, and the shareholders questioned her, indicating that she should not have the control she should have, perhaps this can reflect her lack of ability to resolve the conflict.
And what can explain her impulsiveness and naivety is that she threw out the resignation letter. Just because she was questioned by shareholders, she thought that she could not perform her duties, so she easily picked on her, showing that she lacked the wisdom to solve the problem, and seemed to plan to retreat into advance, using the uninformed but easily incited power on the Internet to put herself on the side of justice. But if so, you must be prepared to be reversed, the Internet has always been able to kill, and it can also be killed, the rhythm is brought, and the ghosts and gods are unstoppable!
The reason why I have such suspicions is that, according to the news of the Financial Associated Press on July 22, Wahaha issued a statement that in order to ensure the stable and healthy development of the company, Ms. Zong Fuli decided to continue to perform the relevant management responsibilities of Wahaha Group after friendly consultation among all shareholders.
In just one week, the result of the game was that Zong Fuli continued to stay in office. It looks like this is her victory, but I don't think this news is worth rejoicing, because in this game, what did Zong Fuli rely on to win the victory? How did the Shangcheng District government and some shareholders think that their questioning of Zong Fuli was too hasty?
Of course, these problems are unknown to us as outsiders. But I think that if the outcome of this game is because there is the power of public opinion at the mercy, it is terrible, because it means that the use of public opinion to coerce people who do not know the truth to form a strong pressure can achieve victory, then what way out can justice and truth be?