Copywriting | Wu XVII
Edit | Wu XVII
As we all know, "the world is so big that there are no wonders", and on the road of exploring the unknown and pursuing the truth, all kinds of new things are always emerging.
No, NASA's recent commemoration of the 55th anniversary of the Apollo moon landing was an event full of commemorative significance and historical value, but it made a big show.
NASA had been posting on social media to commemorate this great moment, and they carefully curated the copywriting, accompanying the pictures, and were full of anticipation, hoping to receive a bunch of likes and emotions, and people to receive praise and respect for the great feat of human exploration of space.
As a result, it backfired, and the comment area became a "battlefield".
A flood of "conspiracy theorists" and "skeptics" rushed in, each expressing their opinions and arguing with each other.
They expressed their opinions, some of them vehemently saying that the Apollo moon landing was nothing more than an elaborate hoax; Others questioned the technical conditions at that time, which simply did not allow for the difficult task of landing on the moon.
For a while, the comment area was filled with gunsmoke, and the scene was simply amazing.
The post originally intended to commemorate the post has become a fierce confrontation between the two sides, with all parties arguing on the basis of reason and not giving in to each other, and the popularity continues to rise, causing widespread attention and discussion.
On July 20, NASA sent a commemorative post with excitement and pride, accompanied by a photo of the Apollo 11 astronauts on the moon.
That photograph carries the great dream and achievements of human exploration of space, what a wonderful thing it should be, and it is a high respect and commemoration of human courage and wisdom.
Unexpectedly, things turned out more than NASA expected.
In the comment area, all kinds of doubts came and went.
Some people say, "Why is the flag moving, is there wind?", this seemingly simple but provocative question, instantly aroused a lot of attention and discussion; There are also people who say categorically, "This is fake, it was filmed in the studio", and the tone is full of certainty and suspicion; What's more, they have taken pains to come up with all kinds of so-called "evidence", such as pointing out that the angle of the shadows in the photos is wrong, and there are suspicious sources of light, to prove that the moon landing was an elaborate hoax.
They expressed their opinions fiercely in the comment section, and related discussions continued to spread and ferment, making this event, which was originally meant to be commemorating, fall into a whirlpool of controversy, and the situation became uncontrollable.
However, in the face of these doubts and controversies, the scientific community and NASA did not sit idle, and acted quickly to defend the truth.
The scientific community has come up with a pile of solid and reliable research evidence to try to clear the light of day.
For example, the results of the analysis of the lunar landing rocks are based on scientific data to support the fact of the lunar landing by detailed analysis of the composition, structure, and formation age of the rock samples brought back from the moon. There is also the trajectory of the lunar rover, which leaves clear ruts on the surface of the moon, which is a strong proof of human activity; and the observatory track, which details a variety of data and information throughout the lunar landing.
NASA has also responded positively on many occasions and spared no effort to prove the authenticity of the moon landing.
First, they released a large number of clear photos and precious video materials to show the details of the moon landing in an all-round way; It is also to disclose detailed technical information, from the design principle of the spacecraft to the calculation of the flight trajectory, which is presented to the public without reservation.
In addition, the astronauts and ground controllers who participated in the mission also came forward to share their personal experiences, tell about the unknown hardships and dedications, recall the bits and pieces of the mission, and use the most authentic voices and the most vivid stories to refute those baseless conspiracy theories and rumors.
The Apollo moon landing is undoubtedly a great event in the history of human spaceflight, and it represents the spirit and great achievements of mankind's courageous exploration of the unknown world.
Those baseless doubts are ridiculous and unreliable.
Science is rigorous, it is about evidence, and it cannot be based on subjective assumptions and random speculation.
Any groundless speculation and suspicion without scientific basis is a blasphemy against the spirit of science and a disrespect to those scientific researchers and astronauts who have devoted their efforts to the cause of science.
For a landmark event like the Apollo moon landing, every link and every achievement embodies the wisdom and sweat of countless people, and there is no room for groundless slander and doubt.
However, this series of doubts also shows that for major scientific events, it is essential to clearly present the evidence and principles to the public.
If only the relevant principles and bases are known in the professional field, and the public does not know about them, then it is easy to have poor information, which can lead to misunderstandings.
For example, in this case, if NASA and the scientific community could present the complete chain of evidence and scientific principles of the moon landing to the public in an easy-to-understand way from the very beginning, they might be able to avoid these meaningless doubts and misunderstandings to a large extent, and make the scientific results better understood and accepted by the public.