Text: Yu Yu
Edited by Yu Yu
Preface:
At the NATO summit, China once again became the target of public criticism, and those Western powers, following the pace of United States, not only pointed fingers at China, but also threatened to make us pay the price.
In the face of such an aggressive posture, one can't help but think: If we really meet each other, can we resist the joint attack of the 30 NATO countries?
Just when everyone was talking, the answer of a Russia general attracted widespread attention, what did his words reveal? Let's unravel this mystery.
From History to the Present: The Metamorphosis of China's Power
Who remembers that outrageous night in 1999? NATO missiles accurately bombed the mainland's embassy in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, killing and injuring mainland diplomats.
At that time, we people seemed to have no other way but to launch some street protests, what a humiliation! But feng shui takes turns, and today, 23 years later, the situation is very different.
In 2022, when Serbia was once again threatened by NATO over the Kosovo issue, China immediately sent six Y-20 strategic transport planes across 8,000 kilometers to Belgrade with the FK-3 air defense system.
I don't know what it's like to see this scene in the hearts of those NATO people? What is even more reassuring is that our Y-20 also crossed the airspace of NATO member states, and they did not even dare to let out a fart.
This huge contrast is the best portrayal of China's transformation of strength, and today's China already has world-class weapons and equipment.
J-20, Type 055 destroyers, three aircraft carriers, which one is not a well-known big killer? In particular, the electromagnetic catapult technology on the Fujian is a cutting-edge technology that only we and the United States have in the world.
Don't think that we only build weapons, China's influence on the international stage has been increasing in recent years, and China's voice can be heard everywhere from the United Nations to the G20.
The Belt and Road Initiative has shown the world China's economic strength and diplomatic wisdom, and China is playing an increasingly important role in global issues such as climate change and public health.
Support the author, it is not easy to write, there will be 5s advertisements in the text, and you can read the full text for free after watching.
NATO's provocation and China's peaceful position
Speaking of NATO, these guys have been getting more and more disagreeable recently, and at the NATO summit a while ago, they began to point fingers at China again.
And guess what? They actually said that China is a decisive supporter of Russia's war against Ukraine, and they are not afraid to flash their tongues!
What's even more ridiculous is that they have also fabricated a statement about the linkage of Eurasian security in an attempt to extend NATO's tentacles to Asia. Is it a miasma for Asia?
NATO people are becoming more and more restless, they frequently send warships through the Taiwan Strait and conduct military exercises in the Asia-Pacific region, which is simply a show of force at our doorstep. I see, they're full and have nothing to do, and they want to find some excitement.
In the face of these little tricks of NATO, we have always remained calm and rational, and everyone knows that China is a country that has experienced 14 years of resistance against Japan, and we know better than anyone the value of peace.
Our attitude has always been clear: every country has the right to choose its own development path, no one can point fingers at others, and we have always advocated a peaceful solution to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, rather than adding fuel to the fire as some countries have done.
In the final analysis, China has never been a troublemaker, but a guardian of peace, and our insistence on peaceful development and mutual benefit and win-win results is not much better than those countries that think about confrontation all day long?
If those people in NATO really have brains, they should think carefully: In this world, is it better to cooperate or to confront? Is it better to develop peacefully or to have an arms race? Isn't the answer obvious?
Instead of pointing fingers at China all day long, NATO should take care of its own affairs, after all, an alliance that only provokes trouble will not end well.
As for China, we will continue to follow the path of peaceful development and contribute our strength to world peace, which is what a truly responsible major country should do.
China vs NATO
Speaking of the comparison of strength, we have to calculate this account well, the NATO gang shouts all day long, but if they really want to break their wrists, what are their chances of winning?
Let's talk about the strength first, NATO's standing army is 3.5 million, which looks quite bluffing, but don't forget, our PLA is 2.3 million elite! You know, our 2.3 million are all good soldiers.
Besides, we still have 8 million militiamen! Once something happens, tens of millions of troops can be organized in minutes. What is NATO's little bit of men and horses enough for?
Let's take a look at the equipment, our military equipment has advanced by leaps and bounds in recent years! J-20 stealth fighter, Type 055 10,000-ton drive, Liaoning, Shandong, Fujian three aircraft carriers, which one is not a well-known big killer?
Especially the electromagnetic catapult on the Fujian, which is the world's top level! NATO's outdated equipment is nothing compared to ours.
Don't think that's all, our industrial strength is the real killer, China's industrial GDP accounts for 39% of the world's total, what is this concept? That is to say, we are fully capable of continuously providing advanced equipment for the army and fighting a protracted war.
However, having said that, NATO is not monolithic, and many NATO countries have opinions on United States's anti-China policy, and Netherlands and France have publicly stated that they do not support decoupling from China United States.
I see that those people in NATO clamored all day long to deal with China, but in fact, they have no bottom in their hearts, and they also know that the current China is no longer what it used to be.
If nothing else, let's just say that the Type 055 destroyer we sent not long ago dared to confront the United States aircraft carrier battle group single-handedly, and this momentum is scary enough!
To put it bluntly, those people in NATO just rely on the strength of the people to overwhelm us in momentum, but they may have forgotten the old saying: more people does not mean more power.
We Chinese pay attention to the elite soldiers and strong generals, and we pay attention to winning more with less; from the War of Resistance Against Japan to the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, which time has we not defeated the strong with the weak? Now our strength is no longer what it used to be, and if NATO really dares to come hard, I'm afraid we don't even know how we lost!
In a word, if NATO really wants to compare its strength with China, I advise them to weigh it carefully, otherwise they will suffer at that time, but they themselves!
Expert perspective: the assessment of the Russia general
Speaking of the contest between NATO and China, the recent words of a Russia general have caused quite a stir, and this general is not casually talking, but he is a veteran who has personally experienced the contest with NATO.
What did the admiral say? He said bluntly: If NATO really wants to fight China, the end can only be self-inflicted! That's a lot of talk, isn't it? But I don't think the admiral is firing a cannon.
Think about it, Russia is a veteran of dealing with NATO for decades, and they know the details of NATO better than anyone else, and this general dares to say such a thing, he must have a full understanding of China's strength.
And don't forget, Russia is a military power in the world, even they evaluate China like this, then China's strength can be imagined, what kind of evaluation is this, it is simply a five-star praise for China!
In the final analysis, the general's words are not difficult to understand, take the recent NATO summit as an example, their accusations against China are simply ridiculous.
Saying that China threatens NATO's security and that China wants to change the world order, I just want to ask, did China's warships sail to the doorsteps of NATO countries? Is China's military conducting exercises around NATO countries?
On the contrary, NATO, while clamoring for the threat of China, is engaged in a military presence in the Asia-Pacific region and has set up a liaison office in Japan.
I see, behind these small actions of NATO, it is nothing more than United States playing tricks, United States seeing that China is developing well, their hearts are unbalanced, and they want to form gangs to deal with China, but they may forget that the current China is not easy to bully.
The words of the Russia general actually sounded a wake-up call for NATO, if NATO really does not know what is good and bad, and has to fight hard with China, then it is really asking for hardship, and it is they themselves who will suffer losses at that time!
That's why I said, those people in NATO should say less and do more practical things, thinking about how to deal with China all day long, it is better to think about how to solve their own problems, after all, an alliance that only provokes trouble will not end well.
Epilogue:
China's status and influence on the international stage are no longer what they used to be, and in the face of NATO's provocations, we have demonstrated the calmness and self-confidence that a major country should have.
Our military prowess, economic prowess, and diplomatic acumen have forced countries that want to challenge China to reconsider their strategies.
China has always advocated mutual benefit and win-win results, opposed hegemonism and power, and our goal is not to dominate the world, but to make greater contributions to world peace and development.
#长文创作激励计划#
Resources:
Global Network2024-07-11 "NATO Summit Issued a Statement to "Attack China", "Foreign Netizens Can't Stand It!" China has issued a series of rebuttals》
Strait Shinkansen April 23, 2024 "The 75th Anniversary of the Founding of the People's Navy! Looking at the changes in military strength in the past 20 years, the Chinese Navy's counterattack is a miracle》