For your better reading and interactive experience, in order for you to see more content in time, click "Follow", we will update you with wonderful information every day!
Editor: Artichoke Tea Room
This is a "sexual assault" incident that has attracted national attention.
Mao Qi, secretary of the Wannian County Party Committee, was reported to have sexually assaulted her female subordinate Li Peixia, causing an uproar.
As the victim's father, Li Changliu, a retired teacher, took the opportunity to defend his rights by means of online reporting, so that the problem was taken seriously and investigated.
The cause of the whole incident begins with a dispute. On May 23 last year, Li Peixia, secretary of the party committee of Shangfang Township, Wannian County, had a fierce dispute with Mao Qi, secretary of the county party committee.
The reason is that Li Peixia is going to go to the Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision to report some violations of discipline and law by Mao Qi with her real name.
It is worth noting that before this dispute, according to Li Changliu, Moltke had sexually assaulted Li Peixia, and there was a recording as evidence.
Shockingly, just three days later, on May 26, Li Peixia was taken away by the Wannian County Commission for Discipline Inspection and the County Supervisory Committee and has been detained to this day. The official report said that Li Peixia was "suspected of serious violations of discipline and law". In this regard, Li Changliu was deeply suspicious, believing that what happened to his daughter was likely to be done by Moltke in order to "retaliate".
Faced with what happened to his daughter, retired teacher Li Changliu was not afraid of authority and decided to seek justice for her daughter at all costs. He chose a very bold approach - publicly reporting on the Internet with his real name that Mao Qi, secretary of the Wannian County Party Committee, was suspected of sexually assaulting a female subordinate.
Li Changliu posted a video of the report online, clearly explaining the ins and outs of the incident. As soon as the video was released, it attracted huge attention online, and gradually turned into a surging torrent of public opinion, forming strong pressure on the local government.
In the face of the high attention of public opinion, the Shangrao Municipal Party Committee reacted quickly. On July 25, the Shangrao Municipal Party Committee announced the immediate establishment of a joint investigation team to conduct a thorough investigation into the matter. Moreover, it made it clear that the results of the investigation will be released to the public in a timely manner.
On the morning of 26 July, the day after the investigation team was established, a number of staff members of the investigation team made a special trip to other provinces to meet with the person concerned, Li Changliu. During this meeting, Li Changliu gave a detailed account of the evidence in his possession to the investigation team, and obtained a promise from the investigation team that "it will conduct a fair and serious investigation."
Judging from Li Changliu's description, the evidence in his hands carries a lot of weight. The first is the USB flash drive that his daughter handed to him, which contains a recording of Moltke sexually assaulting Li Peixia. Secondly, three days before he was detained, Mao Qi and Li Peixia had a fierce dispute, and at that time, Li Peixia made it clear that she would go to the Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision to report Mao Qi in her real name, and the reason for this report was also recorded as evidence.
From these details, it can be seen that Li Changliu is very determined to report and has done enough preparations. Moreover, when meeting with the investigation team, Li Changliu put forward a very insightful suggestion: Since Mao Qi was a provincial cadre, he hoped that the Jiangxi Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Provincial Supervision Commission would attach importance to this matter and intervene in the investigation.
Sure enough, Li Changliu's suggestion was quickly responded. On the evening of the same day, the Jiangxi Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision issued a circular announcing that Mao Qi, secretary of the Wannian County Party Committee, was currently undergoing disciplinary review and supervision investigation by the commission for "suspected serious violations of discipline and law".
Judging from the information available so far, there are indeed many strange things in the incident. For example, Li Peixia made it clear that she wanted to report Mao Qi to the higher-level Commission for Discipline Inspection before she was placed in liuzhi, but she was suddenly taken away for liuzhi only three days later, and the reversal of the situation was too fast. If, as the report said, Li Peixia is really suspected of serious violations of discipline and law, why has there never been any rumors leaked before? As a secretary of a township party committee, his words and deeds should be highly supervised.
Looking at Mao Qi's identity again, as a provincial cadre, his words and deeds have naturally attracted great attention. If he really committed the crime of sexual assault against his subordinates as stated in the report, the heinousness of his behavior can be imagined. This is not only a serious violation of the law, but also a serious violation of discipline, and it is absolutely impossible to be opened to the net.
As a secretary of the grassroots township party committee, Li Peixia, regardless of whether she has serious violations of discipline and law, her father's public reports and accusations against the county party committee secretary on the Internet are worthy of attention and attention. After all, as a retired teacher, it is not easy for Li Changliu to take such an approach, and it must be to defend his daughter's rights and interests, not for other motives.
It is foreseeable that this incident will not stop at the investigation alone. Whatever the outcome, it will have far-reaching implications for the local political ecology. If Moltke is found innocent, will the whistleblower be held responsible? But if Moltke really broke the law, then what happens next? Regardless of how it is handled, it will form a strong deterrent and warning effect on relevant departments.
Of course, we sincerely hope that no matter what the final outcome of the incident is, we hope that justice can be returned to the victims, so that they can regain their dignity and restore justice to society. As for the stubborn disease of public power corruption, we still need all people to work together to eradicate it with the system, adhere to the moral bottom line with actions, and let power truly serve the people, rather than abuse it to harm the people.
(Disclaimer) The process and pictures described in the article are from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible! If there is any doubt about the incident, it will be deleted or changed immediately after contact.