laitimes

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

#长文创作激励计划#

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

Recalling the poems we learned in elementary school, "Leaving the grass on the plain" must be a sentence that everyone will blurt out, as well as "Goose Goose Goose Song to the Sky".

They are all simple and clear verses, which are catchy to read and easy to understand.

But in fact, there are not only four lines of poetry in "Leaving the Grass on the Plain", it has been deleted and the last four sentences have been deleted.

Even the name has changed, and it is very different from before.

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

For such a thing, many parents clapped their hands after knowing about it, and said that they had changed it well.

Has Bai Juyi's poem really been cut? What are the reasons behind this?

1. Bai Juyi and the "Past" of "Grass"

Everyone is absolutely no stranger to Bai Juyi, the great poet of the Tang Dynasty is known as "Poetry Demon", and he has created many poems in his life.

"Spring Trip to Tangqian Lake", "Pipa Xing" and "Song of Long Hatred" are all his well-known works, which are reflected in different stages of students' education.

It is undeniable that Bai Juyi's poems vary in difficulty, and they are covered in textbooks from elementary school to high school.

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

And everyone will find that Bai Juyi's later poems are also becoming more and more sad, which has a certain relationship with his dislike of officialdom.

But at the very beginning, Bai Juyi, like many talented students, was still very yearning for scientific examinations and officialdom, and Bai Juyi had been preparing for scientific examinations very hard since he was a child.

At the time, it was not surprising that everyone wanted to be on the list.

Not only for fame and fortune, Bai Juyi's enthusiasm for poetry is very great.

He loved writing poetry from an early age, and he always kept a habit of letting peddlers and illiterate women listen to his first drafts.

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

Revise the poems through their feelings and strive to make poems that are easy to understand.

Dear readers, the author's income is so meager that he had to include a short 5-second ad in the text, and you can read the full text for free by watching it. I know it might be a little intimidating, but it does help me increase my income and keep writing. Your understanding is my biggest motivation! I'll try to bring more quality content!

Therefore, the works we see in Bai Juyi are relatively easy to understand, and there are few obscure words, which are very suitable for use in general teaching.

Belong to the kind of one that doesn't need to be annotated to understand it.

The "original name" of this "grass" is actually "Farewell to the Ancient Grass", which is a poem written by 16-year-old Bai Juyi, and it is also a poem he gave to Gu Yuanyuan for appreciation.

Because this is a poem he wrote in the imperial examination, and then in order to get a comment on the situation and kind words in front of the examiner, he sent it out.

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

At that time, many students in the imperial examination would do this, which was a very normal move.

As a pivotal figure in the literary world, it goes without saying that the poetry works he received are self-explanatory, and everyone hopes to be recommended by Gu Jing, and the works he receives can't be read every day.

So before watching Bai Juyi's "Farewell to the Ancient Grass", he only regarded him as an ordinary candidate, but he was only 16 years old.

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

After seeing his name, he casually joked with his name and said, "Chang'an rice is expensive, and it is not easy to live in a big place."

The implication is that Chang'an is rich in rice and talents, and it is not easy to gain a foothold here.

But when he finished reading Bai Juyi's works, he immediately changed his tone, shocked by his talent, saying that it was easy for him to have such a talent and gain a foothold in Chang'an.

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

After that, Bai Juyi was indeed the same as Gu said, and he became an important minister in the court all the way, and his career was quite smooth at the beginning.

Although the follow-up words are because of the emperor's dislike, when he has Huaicai and does not worry about the country and the people, it is undeniable that his talent has always been unparalleled.

Second, the last four sentences that have been deleted are the main ones but not suitable for primary school students

Back to the poem itself, the primary school textbook is "Grass", and the complete four sentences in the book are: "Leaving the grass on the plain, one year old and one withering." Wildfires burn inexhaustibly, and spring breezes blow and regenerate. ”

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

The meaning of the poem is also obvious, in my own words, the general meaning is: the grass on the grassland will wither over time, but they are very tough, and with a fire, new grass will grow in the following year.

And "Farewell to the Ancient Grass" is its complete version, and four sentences have been deleted at the end: "Yuanfang invades the ancient road, and Qingcui connects the deserted city." He sent Wang Sun to go, full of farewell. ”

Whether it is in terms of artistic conception or subject matter, the first four sentences and the last four sentences are very different.

The approximate vernacular version of the last four sentences is: these tough grasses pave the road in disrepair in the distance, and the grass spreads, and the grass has a special mood under the backdrop of the grass.

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

Seeing me say goodbye to my good friend again and again, it was really very reluctant.

Every leaf in the air and every grass on the ground are expressing my reluctance, swaying to keep my friends.

I have to say that this poem is very powerful, but the most powerful thing is its popularity and smoothness.

Every sentence is easy to understand, and every sentence can be connected up and down.

The first ten sentences and the last ten lines can be independently formed into a new poem, and they are two completely different flavors and artistic conceptions.

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

The first ten sentences describe Xiaocao's tenacity and positive mental attitude of "blowing the wind and growing again", while the last ten sentences are reluctance to part with friends, full of sadness, sadness and reluctance.

If you put all these together, it is a poem with foreshadowing and the integrity of the story scene.

But if you take it apart, it is two different poems and two different things.

At the same time, it also sends a signal that there is a lot of room for the poem to play with.

To put it simply, the poem "Farewell to the Ancient Grass" can be deleted and sent to a more suitable level of education.

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

Therefore, in the face of the choice of primary school education content, the easy-to-understand and positive "Grass" is more suitable.

This is exactly what they have done by cutting out "Farewell to the Ancient Grass", which is easier to read and write and more suitable for students of this age, and is also full of positive attitudes.

When teaching, teachers can also help students understand this emotion very well, and help elementary school students become "strong" and "brave" like grass.

It's a poem that's more suitable for the education of primary school students.,Personally, I feel that this deletion is still very reasonable.。

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

And this also reflects that on the one hand, primary education should focus on students' positive thinking, and pay attention to the order, so that children can accept ancient poems from shallow to deep.

If they are asked to learn poems that are too complex and boring at the beginning, it will also be a challenge and a blow to them.

The inability to digest the meaning and negative emotions of a poem in a short period of time will also cause them to reject the verse.

It hinders the cultivation of students' interest in learning, and will also have a certain impact on students' psychology.

Of course, neither the parents and the school want to see it.

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

They want primary school students to receive a relaxed, fun and positive education, and appropriate learning content is crucial!

3. Articles extolling heroic deeds in primary school textbooks have also been deleted

In addition to Bai Juyi's poems, some very meaningful heroic deeds have been deleted from primary school textbooks.

For example, articles like "Lei Feng's Notes", "Liu Hulan" and "Five Heroes of Langya Mountain".

It is undeniable that these are very good articles, and they are all the people we respect the most.

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

They sacrificed needlessly, gave their all, and were truly good people.

It stands to reason that it is very suitable for use in textbooks, after all, it does have positive educational significance.

But there are also some hidden dangers, especially for elementary school students with weak sense of discrimination.

On the one hand, it is necessary to avoid primary school students from imitating too much and not valuing life.

These texts are all absolutely positive characters, heroes who are generous to others and sacrifice their lives.

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

They will selflessly sacrifice themselves, even their own lives, for the benefit of others.

But this is not the part we want children to imitate excessively, and the unnecessary sacrifice caused by blind imitation is something that everyone does not want to see.

On the other hand, it is necessary to avoid the weakening of anti-fraud awareness due to excessive kindness of students.

When they see Lei Feng's colleagues doing good deeds, many sincere children will be moved by it and vow that they will also become a good student who is willing to help.

It's okay to simply help your family with housework and help your classmates study.

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

But the bad is bad in today's society, which is still relatively complicated, and there are good people and bad people, especially some child traffickers who abduct and sell children, which are endless tricks.

They may pretend to be a "vulnerable group" in need to communicate their needs to them, and children can easily be put in danger.

Because for elementary school students, their ability to distinguish right from wrong, good and bad at this age is limited.

Under the influence of fairy tales, they are also very simple, and it is easy to blindly help others to put themselves in danger.

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

Finally, let students have a broader understanding.

It is undeniable that these heroic warriors are indeed good people in the true sense of the word, and they are the loveliest people.

But with the progress and development of the times, lovely people and good people also include more.

Firefighters and police officers are lovely people, and relevant articles and content are bound to need today's children to learn and understand.

It is also a practice to remove some content appropriately to facilitate updating and supplementing new content.

epilogue

Bai Juyi is indeed a well-deserved "poetry demon" and a great writer, and his poetry works are very good.

Why did the textbook delete the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain"? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

"Farewell to the Ancient Grass" is a typical example, and the connection between the top and bottom is close and interesting.

Whether it is the original poem or the deleted "Grass", it is a very good work.

And after the deletion, the work is more powerful, more positive, and more understandable, suitable for primary school students to learn, and learn tenacity and positive attitude from the grass.

Like "Grass", there are many articles and poems that have been deleted or even deleted from primary school textbooks.

On the one hand, it is necessary to update the knowledge base to meet the current social situation, and on the other hand, it is necessary for students to be able to learn positive and positive content from the shallow to the deep.

In the final analysis, it takes into account the characteristics of elementary school students and is for their good.

Bibliography:

Poetry Man Travels2024-4-4Why did the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain" be deleted from the textbook? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

Jincai She2024-2-23Why did the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain" be deleted in the textbook? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

Su Nian Literature and History R2024-4-1 Why did the last four sentences of "Leaving the Grass on the Plain" be deleted in the textbook? After reading the original poem, do you think it should be deleted?

Leisurely years2021-6-18Four texts have been deleted from primary school Chinese textbooks, do you know which ones? Why delete