Lead:
"Is there really no problem with the Chinese swimming team this time?
Haven't there been a lot of doping incidents before?
So it's normal if something happens again this time, right?"
This is a report published by the United States media "New York Times" during Paris about the positive urine test of the Chinese team.
As soon as this article came out, it instantly caused widespread discussion on the Internet, and everyone was worried about the Chinese swimming team.
It is about the honor and reputation of Chinese athletes, and this report of the "New York Times" was instantly pushed to the forefront.
However, the Chinese Anti-Doping Center replied: "During the tenure of the director of the Chinese Anti-Doping Center, there has never been any doping problem.
Even back then, we confirmed that there was absolutely no wrongdoing on their part. ”
Background
According to the introduction of the China Anti-Doping Center, some related doping incidents did occur because athletes accidentally ate contaminated meat during the competition.
But the New York Times report, published without providing any evidence, has sparked huge doubts on the Internet, which not only makes Chinese athletes worry that their interests will be harmed, but also makes people deeply suspicious of the behavior of the United States media.
After learning of this incident, China's anti-doping center immediately refuted the rumors, and said: "The Chinese anti-doping center and its director reiterate that we fully support the international anti-doping fight.
All athletes have been tested for anti-doping since 2009 and have undergone joint testing and notification internationally. ”
Based on this statement, we can see that the China Anti-Doping Center attaches great importance to the issue of anti-doping and actively cooperates with the international anti-doping struggle, which reflects the importance of China to sports fairness.
At the same time, we also see that the China Anti-Doping Center and its director work transparently to ensure fair competition for athletes.
However, the New York Times still insisted on its reporting and, without any evidence, smeared the work of the Chinese Anti-Doping Center, which raises questions about whether the New York Times report was politically motivated.
Why United States media would report so maliciously on Chinese athletes is reminiscent of the anti-doping campaign in United States.
The United States has always taken anti-doping issues very seriously, and the anti-doping movement in the United States has achieved a lot.
But in the anti-doping movement in the United States, there have never been Chinese athletes.
Whether it is the Olympic Games, the World Championships, the World Cup and other international competitions, the Chinese athletes have achieved excellent results, but they have never been paid attention to by the International Anti-Doping Agency.
This can't help but make people wonder whether the United States media report is out of jealousy and unwillingness for Chinese athletes.
During their time in Paris, Chinese athletes performed very well in swimming events and could even win big gold medals, so the United States media took a harsher attitude towards Chinese athletes.
However, instead of being bothered by these public opinions, Chinese athletes have behaved more confidently and calmly.
In the competition, the Chinese athletes showed super strength and psychological quality, fearless of the ridicule and speculation of the United States media, and won praise from everyone.
The solemn response of the Chinese Anti-Doping Center
The China Anti-Doping Center responded solemnly to the malicious reports of the United States media, saying:
"The China Anti-Doping Center has always adhered to the principle of anti-doping and protected the rights and interests of athletes.
All the measures we take are to uphold the integrity of sport, and there is no wrongdoing. ”
The director of the China Anti-Doping Center also reiterated: "As the director of the China Anti-Doping Center, during my tenure, I have always adhered to the principles of justice, fairness and openness, and there has been absolutely no favoritism or malpractice."
The China Anti-Doping Center has made it very clear that they are fully committed to protecting the rights and interests of athletes and providing them with a level playing field.
FINA also expressed its support, with the FINA President saying:
"We fully support the work of the China Anti-Doping Center, and we firmly believe that the China Anti-Doping Center will handle every doping incident fairly and fairly."
This response not only made the China Anti-Doping Center feel gratified, but also made many Chinese athletes feel warm.
The Chinese athletes competing in Paris did not pay much attention to the malicious reports in the United States media, and they focused more on the competition itself, hoping to achieve better results on the field.
However, the United States media has always been not optimistic about the results of the Chinese swimming team.
Even during the competition of the Chinese swimming team, the United States media issued a large number of negative reports, claiming that the Chinese swimming team would definitely be heavily fined for doping incidents.
The psychological quality and competitive ability of Chinese athletes
However, Chinese athletes have responded to the slander of the United States media with their own practical actions.
In the competition, the athletes of the Chinese swimming team not only showed a very high level of competition, but also showed super psychological quality in the face of various external pressures.
Some netizens posted a video on social platforms in which a female athlete on the Chinese swimming team was very frustrated when she finished sixth in an event.
Netizens reacted to this: "This is the spirit of the Chinese swimming team, even in the face of various difficulties and pressures, they still do not forget to pursue higher goals."
These words are deeply gratifying that the excellence of Chinese athletes is not only reflected in their competitive ability, but also in their indomitable spirit.
However, as the competition progressed, the Chinese athletes performed better and better, and eventually won the gold medals in all the competitions.
This achievement not only made the Chinese team excited, but also shocked the international sports circles, while the United States media was completely dumbfounded and could no longer criticize and blame the Chinese team.
In the harsh environment, the indomitable spirit and tenacity of Chinese athletes have been praised by the whole world.
FINA spoke highly of the performance of the Chinese athletes and said that FINA has always been committed to safeguarding the rights and interests of athletes and ensuring that they are treated fairly in competitions.
Chinese athletes also responded:
"We are grateful to FINA for their support, as well as to the China Anti-Doping Center for its efforts.
The fight against doping is a difficult and long-term task, and we will always work hand in hand with the International Anti-Doping Agency to uphold the fairness and integrity of sport. ”
epilogue
The fight against doping is a long and complex process, not only for China, but also for the international community.
Countries should exchange information and share experiences, cooperate in anti-doping work, establish globally harmonized standards and rules, and avoid political injustices.
In addition, anti-doping work requires scientific and rigorous technical means, and the international community should increase investment in scientific research to promote innovation and progress in anti-doping technology and improve the sensitivity and accuracy of testing.
Only in this way can doping be better detected and punished, and fairness and justice in sport can be maintained.
The charm of sport is competition, not the saliva that comes with doping.
It is hoped that countries can be more friendly and respect each other, jointly promote the development of anti-doping work, and create a fair and fair competition environment for athletes around the world.