For a long time, the United States has been playing up the so-called Chinese military threat, and at the same time trying to morally kidnap the PLA, because it is playing up the serious consequences of the PLA's military unification of Taiwan Island, and now United States scholars are once again not allowing the PLA to do so. According to United States media reports, Andrew ·Erickson, a professor at the United States Naval War College, and Gallberry · Collins, researchers at United States Rice University, jointly published an article expounding their views on the impact of the conflict in the Taiwan Strait. United States scholars believe that the PLA's military reunification of Taiwan is not only because it wants to control Taiwan, but also because it wants to control the island's industrial and technological base, especially the semiconductor industry. In recent years, the United States has frequently hyped up Taiwan's important position in the semiconductor field, trying to carry out moral kidnapping.
Regarding the impact of the conflict in the Taiwan Strait, Andrew · Erickson and Gabriel · Collins jointly said that it will trigger a global economic shock, and the impact is comparable to World War II. According to the analysis of the beacon front station, this is the usual routine of the United States, that is, to influence China's decision-making by exaggerating serious consequences, so as to prevent the PLA from being reunified. The United States government has repeatedly emphasized the status of Taiwan in the field of chips, claiming that once the conflict in the Taiwan Strait occurs, it will have a huge impact on the global economy, obviously United States scholars are actively cooperating with the United States government's remarks and intentions, for United States, it is most beneficial to maintain the non-unity of the two sides of the strait, because in addition to exporting weapons to Taiwan, it can also directly contain China's development, for which there are frequent remarks that the PLA is not allowed to reunify.
The publication of United States scholars has exaggerated the impact of the conflict in the Taiwan Strait on the United States, claiming that United States will fall into a passive situation, because the United States Indo-Pacific alliance will be destroyed, and under China's influence, the United States will become "embattled". In fact, the purpose of United States scholars is very clear, that is, to encourage United States to launch actions, so as to promote the prevention of the PLA's military action against Taiwan, and at the critical moment United States scholars will not pretend, and they must promote relevant actions by exaggerating the crisis of the United States. Andrew · Erikson and Gabriel · Collins also declared that once the PLA consoles the island, it will accelerate the global nuclear arms race, which will lead to more tense international tensions.
In fact, United States scholars did not point out whether United States would interfere in the conflict in the Taiwan Strait, but judging from the situation of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, United States is bound to take action to further encircle and contain China, in fact, it can be seen from NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg chanting "Ukraine Taiwan Island today and tomorrow", at that time, Western countries will directly copy the routine of dealing with Russia to deal with China, United States when dealing with Russia through the Russia-Ukraine conflict, a variety of sanctions have been verified, Among them is preparations to deal with China. The West is no longer hiding it, that is, to warn China through Russia's pain.
During the game between United States and China, United States was determined to use the "Taiwan card", and for this reason, there was a momentum of United States scholars, and it was obviously not the first time, and United States think tanks were also constantly blowing the wind to exaggerate the serious consequences caused by the conflict in the Taiwan Strait, but in fact, the purpose was also very clear, that is, to maintain the so-called "status quo". In recent years, the United States, Japan, South Korea, and other countries have been clamoring for China not to change the status quo, including the Taiwan Strait issue.