Journalist turned hitter? Sweden female reporter actually rushed into Wang Chuqin for Bo's eyeballs! The Paris Organising Committee was furious and banned from the stadium on the spot. News or a gimmick? What is the ethics of the profession? What kind of media chaos is reflected behind this farce?
Loading...
Guys, look at this farce! A Sweden female journalist actually came up with such a bad idea - to rush our table tennis player Wang Chuqin to get the eyeballs. This is good, not only did it not get hot, but it was kicked out by the Paris Olympic Organizing Committee. This is a strange case in the media circle!
**This reporter's eldest sister, are you squeezed by the door?**Serious interviews can't be done, what's going on with this porcelain drama? Such a bump, not only did not earn eyeballs, but also knocked out his career. Well, the whole world knows that you are a third-rate journalist.
Seriously, this low-level operation is simply jaw-dropping. As a professional journalist, shouldn't your job be to do interviews and in-depth reporting? The result was good, and he played the trick of touching porcelain. Isn't that a waste of your own professional ethics?
When will the media chaos stop
**Look at the current media circle, it's really chaotic!**In order to attract attention, all tricks are used. Some spread rumors, some took things out of context, and some started directly like this Sweden sister. Where is the slightest bit of journalistic ethics?
To put it bluntly, there is something wrong with values. Many people enter the industry not to spread the truth and serve the society, but to rub traffic and make quick money. This mentality of rushing for quick success is the root cause of the media chaos.
And you see, this chaos is still spreading internationally. **In the past, at most, the domestic media played some tricks, but now even on the international stage such as the Olympic Games, there are people who dare to come nonsense. This is not only a matter of personal ethics, but also a problem of the entire industry ecology.
Professional ethics can not be lost
**Returning to this incident, we have to admire the decisiveness of the Paris Olympic Organizing Committee. ** A direct ban knocked the unruly reporter out of the arena. This kind of practice of maintaining the order of the event and protecting the rights and interests of athletes is worthy of praise!
But then again, is it enough to just punish a few people?**I don't think so. To eradicate this kind of chaos, we must start from the source. Media organizations should strengthen professional ethics education, industry associations should improve self-discipline mechanisms, and regulatory departments should also draw clear red lines. Only a multi-pronged approach can restore the credibility of the media.
As an individual journalist, it is also important to be mindful of their responsibilities. What is the vocation of a journalist? It is to spread the truth and serve the society, not to grandstand, and not to use unscrupulous means for personal gain.
Positive energy is born to the sun
Actually, it's not that hard to do journalism. ** An elite athlete like Wang Chuqin, their story is wonderful in itself. Dig with your heart and tell with love, why worry about not being able to make good works? Why do you want to engage in all these crooked ways?
**I believe that most of my fellow journalists are still doing their job. They are unknown, but they are spreading positive energy in their own way. Although this incident is infuriating, it also gives us an opportunity to reflect. Let's work together to give the media a blue sky!
Finally, I wish Wang Chuqin and all the Olympic athletes!**I hope you will sweat hard and create good results on the field. We will use the most sincere shots and brushstrokes to record your wonderful moments!
So in the end, the editor would like to ask: In the face of such media chaos, how should we ordinary people distinguish between right and wrong and distinguish between truth and falsehood? Should all news reports be treated with skepticism? What do you think about this?