The word "disputable" is derogatory and vulgar. As ordinary people, it is best for us ordinary people not to talk about national policies, because you cannot guarantee that you can fully understand and comprehend the connotation of the policy, so you are likely to misinterpret and maliciously misinterpret the policy, which will cause adverse effects and even pay the legal price.
Some people can't tell the difference between "discussion" and "discussion", and say "I" is just to discuss, how can it become "discussion"? Isn't it okay for ordinary people to discuss and discuss normally? Some of these people really can't distinguish between "discussion" and "discourse"; The other part is to deliberately confuse the two concepts in an attempt to create contradictions.
The so-called unreasonable discussion refers to a discussion that ignores the factual basis and the conditions of the customer, and goes beyond common sense. Argumenters usually have extreme subjectivism, a strong self-righteous individual mentality, and a sense of hostility and resistance, which is fundamentally different from "discussion", and is an abnormal and irrational voice.
The formulation and implementation of each major policy has been carefully considered by the decision-making department, which is in line with the background of the times and is also a good measure for the benefit of the country and the people. We can study and interpret various policies, publicize and practice various policies, so as to deeply understand and resolutely implement them. However, we must not let our temperament be unrestrained and wantonly make reckless discussions, which will cause a very bad impact.