01. For those who have taken the first-class constructor exam, the top-secret questions before the exam are always particularly eye-catching. After all, if you can get such a document, even if the previous review is not satisfactory, you may be able to pass the test smoothly because of the high school entrance examination. Sometimes, the passing score of 96 seems to be within reach, just a few points away.
Online course Xueba real class (馊索\/letter public account), Home Online class, follow the teacher to learn twice the result with half the effort, plus the question bank practice, easy to pass the exam
When I was preparing for the first-level municipal exam, I received a pre-exam secret on the Friday night before the exam, which contained more than 300 knowledge points. The training provider claims that all test centers are included in this document, even the original test papers. It's hard not to believe such words.
In fact, we will receive many similar questions and overpressure test centers before the test. Which one to believe, the final choice is entirely up to you. Before the first-level municipal exam that year, I received 3 to 5 different overpressure materials, one of which almost seemed to compress the textbook. It was obviously impossible to read it in a short period of time, so I chose an overpressure material with only 5 pages and 300 test center tips.
02. At that time, I also wondered why the training institution didn't take it out to make a lot of money without much fanfare, since the training institution already had a relatively reliable pre-exam question, instead of hiding the real test point in 300 pre-exam overpressure knowledge points, which made it miserable to memorize. It was only later that I realized that this was done in order to claim that these predictions were based on the teaching experience of the instructors, and not on illegally obtaining test questions and answers that were state secrets, which in turn were illegally sold or provided to others for improper benefits.
03. There is a typical example in the case database of the people's courts, that is, the judgment of the 2017 first-level municipal professional leakage case.
\/Xin Yusuo Mini Program Question Bank Quick Learning Manual, Chapter Practice Questions, More Than Ten Years of Real Questions, Mock Exams, Pre-test Predictions, Good Helpers for Practicing Scores, Essential Question Banks
In this case, the harshest sentence was given to Wen Mouneng, who was sentenced to five years and six months in prison and fined 1.5 million yuan for proposing and instructing others to leak questions, and was also banned from practicing related professions.
The central figure in the leak is Wang Moujun, a university professor and a member of the proposition expert group.
Wang Moujun used his identity as a proposition expert and his previous experience in writing questions to bring out the test center of most of the real test papers out of the proposition place through memory, and accepted a bribe of 1.2 million yuan that Wen could provide.
As a result, Wang was sentenced to five years and three months in prison and a fine of 1.2 million yuan, and was disqualified from continuing to serve as a university professor.
Wen Mourong is a relative of Wen Mouoneng, he participated in the small class secret training organized by Wen Mouneng, and charged the students on behalf of Wen Mouneng, so he was also punished heavily.
In this case, the person who obtained the materials at the end was Jiang, who obtained the pre-test secret materials from others that were highly similar to the real test questions and sold them to other candidates for 1,200 yuan. Jiang was sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment, suspended sentence, and fined.
In addition, the court also issued a restraining order against Jiang, who may never be able to take the constructor exam again.